Olympus SH-3 vs Sony W350
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
97 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony W350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced February 2016
- Replaced the Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 91 x 52 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus SH-3 vs Sony W350 Overview
Here is a complete review of the Olympus SH-3 and Sony W350, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the SH-3 (16MP) and the W350 (14MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SH-3 was revealed 6 years later than the W350 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera and the Sony W350 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the SH-3 matches up vs the W350 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus SH-3 vs Sony W350 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus SH-3 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus SH-3 Gallery & Sony W350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Sony W350
| SH-3 | W350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2016 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 75 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony W350 over the Olympus SH-3
| W350 | SH-3 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Sony W350
| SH-3 | W350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony W350 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus SH-3 has physical measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Sony W350 has measurements of 91mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") having a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SH-3 and Sony W350 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is a front view size comparison of the SH-3 against the W350.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the SH-3 and W350 is 88 and 97 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony W350 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizing merely by going through specifications. The visual below will give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SH-3 and W350.
Plainly, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus SH-3 to produce greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The fresher SH-3 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony W350 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony W350 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2016-02-08 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.7-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 2s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 11.5 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 3.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 271g (0.60 lbs) | 117g (0.26 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 91 x 52 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $579 | $200 |