Olympus SH-3 vs Sony WX220
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
96 Imaging
42 Features
41 Overall
41
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony WX220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released February 2016
- Old Model is Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 52 x 22mm
- Introduced February 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus SH-3 vs Sony WX220 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Olympus SH-3 vs Sony WX220, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the SH-3 (16MP) and the WX220 (18MP) is very similar and both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SH-3 was released 2 years later than the WX220 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera and the Sony WX220 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the SH-3 matches up against the WX220 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus SH-3 vs Sony WX220 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus SH-3 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus SH-3 Gallery & Sony WX220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Sony WX220
| SH-3 | WX220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 |  | February 2014 | Fresher by 25 months |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony WX220 over the Olympus SH-3
| WX220 | SH-3 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Sony WX220
| SH-3 | WX220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display sizing |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony WX220 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera, you should think about its weight and volume. The Olympus SH-3 features external measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Sony WX220 has sizing of 92mm x 52mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus SH-3 vs Sony WX220 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the SH-3 vs the WX220.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the SH-3 and WX220 is 88 and 96 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony WX220 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing purely by reading specifications. The visual underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the SH-3 and WX220.
To sum up, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can expect to see the Sony WX220 to offer extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images more aggressively. The newer SH-3 should have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony WX220 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony WX220 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2016-02-08 | 2014-02-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 11.5 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 3.70 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, on, slow synchro, off, advanced |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 271g (0.60 pounds) | 121g (0.27 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 92 x 52 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photos | 210 photos |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $579 | $198 |