Olympus SH-3 vs Sony WX220
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
96 Imaging
42 Features
41 Overall
41
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony WX220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released February 2016
- Old Model is Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 52 x 22mm
- Introduced February 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus SH-3 vs Sony WX220 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Olympus SH-3 vs Sony WX220, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the SH-3 (16MP) and the WX220 (18MP) is very similar and both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SH-3 was released 2 years later than the WX220 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera and the Sony WX220 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the SH-3 matches up against the WX220 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus SH-3 vs Sony WX220 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus SH-3 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus SH-3 Gallery & Sony WX220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Sony WX220
| SH-3 | WX220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 |  | February 2014 | Fresher by 25 months |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony WX220 over the Olympus SH-3
| WX220 | SH-3 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Sony WX220
| SH-3 | WX220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display sizing |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony WX220 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera, you should think about its weight and volume. The Olympus SH-3 features external measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Sony WX220 has sizing of 92mm x 52mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus SH-3 vs Sony WX220 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the SH-3 vs the WX220.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the SH-3 and WX220 is 88 and 96 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony WX220 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing purely by reading specifications. The visual underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the SH-3 and WX220.
To sum up, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can expect to see the Sony WX220 to offer extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images more aggressively. The newer SH-3 should have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony WX220 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony WX220 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2016-02-08 | 2014-02-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 11.5 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 3.70 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, on, slow synchro, off, advanced |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 271g (0.60 pounds) | 121g (0.27 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 92 x 52 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photos | 210 photos |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $579 | $198 |