Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus TG-310
63 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 594g - 122 x 91 x 133mm
- Announced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2011
Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus TG-310, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both sold by Olympus. The image resolution of the SP-100 (16MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is relatively similar and they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SP-100 was revealed 3 years later than the TG-310 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus SP-100 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the SP-100 scores vs the TG-310 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus SP-100 & Olympus TG-310. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-100 Gallery & Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-100 over the Olympus TG-310
SP-100 | TG-310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2014 | January 2011 | More recent by 38 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Olympus SP-100
TG-310 | SP-100 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus SP-100 and Olympus TG-310
SP-100 | TG-310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-100 enjoys external dimensions of 122mm x 91mm x 133mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 5.2") and a weight of 594 grams (1.31 lbs) and the Olympus TG-310 has sizing of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus TG-310 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at the time. Here is the front view size comparison of the SP-100 versus the TG-310.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the SP-100 and TG-310 is 63 and 94 respectively.
Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements purely by reading specs. The graphic below may give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-100 and TG-310.
All in all, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can count on the Olympus SP-100 to offer you extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more modern SP-100 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SP-100 | Olympus TG-310 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus Stylus SP-100 | Olympus TG-310 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Announced | 2014-01-29 | 2011-01-06 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 920 thousand dot | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Fill-in, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Optional | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 594g (1.31 pounds) | 155g (0.34 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 91 x 133mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 5.2") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | 150 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-92B | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $400 | $0 |