Olympus SP-100 vs Panasonic GX9
63 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a364/2a3647a98ab0bb484e2e78927db40e2edfac5dc0" alt="Olympus Stylus SP-100 front Olympus Stylus SP-100 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92d5a/92d5aaf7d395530441c4baf1340786d20e9e4aff" alt="Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 front Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 front"
82 Imaging
60 Features
80 Overall
68
Olympus SP-100 vs Panasonic GX9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 594g - 122 x 91 x 133mm
- Announced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 407g - 124 x 72 x 47mm
- Announced February 2018
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus SP-100 vs Panasonic GX9 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus SP-100 and Panasonic GX9, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the SP-100 (16MP) and the GX9 (20MP) is relatively similar but the SP-100 (1/2.3") and GX9 (Four Thirds) use different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The SP-100 was released 5 years earlier than the GX9 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus SP-100 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Panasonic GX9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick overview of how the SP-100 grades versus the GX9 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus SP-100 vs Panasonic GX9 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus SP-100 & Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9. The complete galleries are available at Olympus SP-100 Gallery & Panasonic GX9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-100 over the Panasonic GX9
SP-100 | GX9 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic GX9 over the Olympus SP-100
GX9 | SP-100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | ![]() | January 2014 | Newer by 49 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1240k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+780k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SP-100 and Panasonic GX9
SP-100 | GX9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus SP-100 vs Panasonic GX9 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SP-100 provides external dimensions of 122mm x 91mm x 133mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 5.2") accompanied by a weight of 594 grams (1.31 lbs) whilst the Panasonic GX9 has dimensions of 124mm x 72mm x 47mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.9") along with a weight of 407 grams (0.90 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus SP-100 and Panasonic GX9 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is the front view scale comparison of the SP-100 compared to the GX9.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d479/1d479ec160ee281372604d1124c0df0813c49b09" alt="Olympus SP-100 vs Panasonic GX9 size comparison Olympus SP-100 vs Panasonic GX9 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the SP-100 and GX9 is 63 and 82 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ea65/7ea65bed24bfa14691a2e4bba3840f85d914fd11" alt="Olympus SP-100 vs Panasonic GX9 top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-100 vs Panasonic GX9 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-100 vs Panasonic GX9 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading technical specs. The image here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-100 and GX9.
As you have seen, both of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The SP-100 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Panasonic GX9 will offer you more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged SP-100 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/956ea/956eaec90810a2ac5fd0c10e9b48229627b766b5" alt="Olympus SP-100 vs Panasonic GX9 sensor size comparison Olympus SP-100 vs Panasonic GX9 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-100 vs Panasonic GX9 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f0b1/2f0b159fd742921e70bb42394dd498c0109edba4" alt="Olympus SP-100 vs Panasonic GX9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-100 vs Panasonic GX9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus SP-100 vs Panasonic GX9 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SP-100 | Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus SP-100 | Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2014-01-29 | 2018-02-13 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 1,240k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 920k dot | 2,760k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0fps | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 6.00 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash modes | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Fill-in, Off | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Optional | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 594 grams (1.31 lbs) | 407 grams (0.90 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 91 x 133mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 5.2") | 124 x 72 x 47mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | 260 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 photos over 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $400 | $1,000 |