Olympus SP-100 vs Ricoh GR II
63 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a364/2a3647a98ab0bb484e2e78927db40e2edfac5dc0" alt="Olympus Stylus SP-100 front Olympus Stylus SP-100 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/697bb/697bb1cdcdb77b7647f93783faecc3a3a6424bc9" alt="Ricoh GR II front Ricoh GR II front"
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
Olympus SP-100 vs Ricoh GR II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Increase to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 594g - 122 x 91 x 133mm
- Launched January 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Revealed June 2015
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus SP-100 vs Ricoh GR II Overview
Here is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus SP-100 versus Ricoh GR II, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the SP-100 (16MP) and the GR II (16MP) is fairly close but the SP-100 (1/2.3") and GR II (APS-C) feature different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The SP-100 was brought out 16 months earlier than the GR II making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus SP-100 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the SP-100 scores vs the GR II in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus SP-100 vs Ricoh GR II Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus SP-100 & Ricoh GR II. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-100 Gallery & Ricoh GR II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-100 over the Ricoh GR II
SP-100 | GR II |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Olympus SP-100
GR II | SP-100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2015 | ![]() | January 2014 | Fresher by 16 months |
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+770k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-100 and Ricoh GR II
SP-100 | GR II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus SP-100 vs Ricoh GR II Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus SP-100 features outside dimensions of 122mm x 91mm x 133mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 5.2") having a weight of 594 grams (1.31 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR II has measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs).
Check out the Olympus SP-100 versus Ricoh GR II in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the SP-100 versus the GR II.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c43d1/c43d1ea53e434f8585cc6e01dce28a7adb5bddb3" alt="Olympus SP-100 vs Ricoh GR II size comparison Olympus SP-100 vs Ricoh GR II size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SP-100 and GR II is 63 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b4c4/7b4c466ee3c40269d4b5e16ddf8bc16f4a19cd91" alt="Olympus SP-100 vs Ricoh GR II top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-100 vs Ricoh GR II top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-100 vs Ricoh GR II Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizing just by looking through specs. The visual underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-100 and GR II.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact megapixels but different sensor sizing. The SP-100 contains the smaller sensor which is going to make getting bokeh more challenging. The older SP-100 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08cd8/08cd8697c60207655940927f9a2aa5ea33bcdcc8" alt="Olympus SP-100 vs Ricoh GR II sensor size comparison Olympus SP-100 vs Ricoh GR II sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-100 vs Ricoh GR II Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20015/20015d7dbaaeb438bfaf03f738ca445c266243f4" alt="Olympus SP-100 vs Ricoh GR II Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-100 vs Ricoh GR II Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus SP-100 vs Ricoh GR II Specifications
Olympus Stylus SP-100 | Ricoh GR II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus Stylus SP-100 | Ricoh GR II |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2014-01-29 | 2015-06-17 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | GR Engine V |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4928 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8-16.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 1,230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 920k dots | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 300s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1700s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 7.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Fill-in, Off | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Optional | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 594g (1.31 pounds) | 251g (0.55 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 91 x 133mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 5.2") | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 80 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1078 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | 320 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-92B | DB-65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $400 | $599 |