Olympus SP-100 vs Ricoh WG-50
63 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Olympus SP-100 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 594g - 122 x 91 x 133mm
- Revealed January 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2017
Olympus SP-100 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
The following is a detailed assessment of the Olympus SP-100 versus Ricoh WG-50, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the SP-100 (16MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is very similar and both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SP-100 was announced 4 years before the WG-50 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus SP-100 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the SP-100 scores versus the WG-50 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus SP-100 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus SP-100 & Ricoh WG-50. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus SP-100 Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-100 over the Ricoh WG-50
SP-100 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Olympus SP-100
WG-50 | SP-100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2017 | January 2014 | Newer by 40 months |
Common features in the Olympus SP-100 and Ricoh WG-50
SP-100 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus SP-100 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-100 enjoys physical measurements of 122mm x 91mm x 133mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 5.2") along with a weight of 594 grams (1.31 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-50 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus SP-100 versus Ricoh WG-50 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the SP-100 vs the WG-50.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SP-100 and WG-50 is 63 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SP-100 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions only by going over specifications. The pic underneath should give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-100 and WG-50.
To sum up, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the identical resolution therefore you can expect similar quality of photos but you might want to take the launch date of the products into consideration. The more aged SP-100 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus SP-100 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SP-100 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SP-100 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Stylus SP-100 | Ricoh WG-50 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2014-01-29 | 2017-05-24 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 920k dots | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/1700s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Fill-in, Off | On, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Optional | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 594g (1.31 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 91 x 133mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 5.2") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | 300 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-92B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $400 | $280 |