Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB35F
Portability
63 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
63 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
Portability
93 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
93 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
Olympus SP-100
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 594g - 122 x 91 x 133mm
- Revealed January 2014
Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB35F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the SP-100 (16MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is relatively close and they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SP-100 was introduced at a similar time to the WB35F which means that they are of a similar age. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus SP-100 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise summation of how the SP-100 grades against the WB35F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus SP-100 & Samsung WB35F. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus SP-100 Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-100 over the Samsung WB35F
| SP-100 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Olympus SP-100
| WB35F | SP-100 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SP-100 and Samsung WB35F
| SP-100 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 |  | January 2014 | Same age |
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither offers Touch screen |
Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus SP-100 offers exterior dimensions of 122mm x 91mm x 133mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 5.2") accompanied by a weight of 594 grams (1.31 lbs) while the Samsung WB35F has measurements of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB35F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the SP-100 and the WB35F.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the SP-100 and WB35F is 63 and 93 respectively.
Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to see the gap in sensor sizes simply by viewing technical specs. The pic underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-100 and WB35F.
As you have seen, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of photos but you should always consider the age of the cameras into account.
Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus SP-100 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB35F as a Portrait photography camera
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
offers face detection focus
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
you can focus manually
decent MP (16MP)
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Olympus SP-100 as a Street photography camera
Samsung WB35F as a Street photography camera
image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
heavier than competitors (594 grams)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (194 grams)
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Olympus SP-100 Sports photography advice
Samsung WB35F Sports photography advice
excellent zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Olympus SP-100 Travel photography details
Samsung WB35F Travel photography details
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
quite wide (24mm)
very long zoom (1200mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
heavier than competitors (594g)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
lighter than competition in class (194g)
decent MP (16MP)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
very long zoom (288mm)
no Time Lapse function
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Olympus SP-100 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung WB35F Landscape photography highlights
has manual focus
quite wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
does not have Time Lapse function
you can focus manually
really wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
lack of manual exposure
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
no Time Lapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Olympus SP-100 Vlogging factors
Samsung WB35F Vlogging factors
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
includes external mic jack
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
display isn't selfie friendly
heavier than competitors (594 grams)
really wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (194 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
no mic socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SP-100 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SP-100 | Samsung WB35F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2014-01-29 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 920 thousand dots | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1700 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Fill-in, Off | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Optional | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 594 grams (1.31 pounds) | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 91 x 133mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 5.2") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 photos | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $400 | $130 |