Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000
69 Imaging
38 Features
29 Overall
34
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e0d4/0e0d4aacb66b19b548b702bfe965d618cb352c1d" alt="Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ front Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-896mm (F3.4-5.7) lens
- 485g - 117 x 78 x 93mm
- Launched August 2012
- Previous Model is Olympus SP-820UZ
- Renewed by Olympus SP-820UZ
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 3000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof and both are built by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the SP-820UZ (14MP) and the Tough-3000 (12MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The SP-820UZ was launched 2 years later than the Tough-3000 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the SP-820UZ matches up vs the Tough-3000 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ & Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery & Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-820UZ over the Olympus Tough-3000
SP-820UZ | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2012 | ![]() | January 2010 | More recent by 32 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus SP-820UZ
Tough-3000 | SP-820UZ |
---|
Common features in the Olympus SP-820UZ and Olympus Tough-3000
SP-820UZ | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SP-820UZ comes with outer dimensions of 117mm x 78mm x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") having a weight of 485 grams (1.07 lbs) while the Olympus Tough-3000 has dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the SP-820UZ against the Tough-3000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1189/f11895ea9dde0544b16927122cf3892d2295c4ed" alt="Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the SP-820UZ and Tough-3000 is 69 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35349/35349a71d19c62ed87d3bef45c126648c91caf22" alt="Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to visualise the difference between sensor measurements only by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-820UZ and Tough-3000.
As you can see, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Olympus SP-820UZ to give more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The younger SP-820UZ will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fb34/7fb341f7cfe47bb16e49b7d4a2677f6ee4964135" alt="Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2ecc/a2eccf4f9dfa007e0a50b77bffd347aeebc88969" alt="Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
Also referred to as | - | mju Tough 3000 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Launched | 2012-08-21 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 22-896mm (40.7x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.4-5.7 | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 2cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 15.00 m | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 180 (30, 240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 485g (1.07 pounds) | 159g (0.35 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 78 x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $299 | $0 |