Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
69 Imaging
38 Features
29 Overall
34
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-896mm (F3.4-5.7) lens
- 485g - 117 x 78 x 93mm
- Introduced August 2012
- Earlier Model is Olympus SP-820UZ
- Replacement is Olympus SP-820UZ
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Launched June 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus TG-2 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof and they are both produced by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the SP-820UZ (14MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is very comparable and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SP-820UZ was unveiled 10 months prior to the TG-2 iHS which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the SP-820UZ grades vs the TG-2 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ and Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery and Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-820UZ over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| SP-820UZ | TG-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus SP-820UZ
| TG-2 iHS | SP-820UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2013 |  | August 2012 | More recent by 10 months |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+150k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-820UZ and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| SP-820UZ | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-820UZ offers outer dimensions of 117mm x 78mm x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") along with a weight of 485 grams (1.07 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-2 iHS has sizing of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus TG-2 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the SP-820UZ against the TG-2 iHS.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the SP-820UZ and TG-2 iHS is 69 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to visualize the difference in sensor measurements purely by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-820UZ and TG-2 iHS.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should expect to see the Olympus SP-820UZ to provide extra detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older SP-820UZ will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2012-08-21 | 2013-06-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 22-896mm (40.7x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-5.7 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 610k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 15.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 180 (30, 240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 485 grams (1.07 pounds) | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 117 x 78 x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $299 | $380 |