Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus TG-3
69 Imaging
37 Features
29 Overall
33
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-896mm (F3.4-5.7) lens
- 485g - 117 x 78 x 93mm
- Announced August 2012
- Old Model is Olympus SP-820UZ
- Renewed by Olympus SP-820UZ
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released March 2014
- Later Model is Olympus TG-4
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
The following is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus TG-3, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both sold by Olympus. The image resolution of the SP-820UZ (14MP) and the TG-3 (16MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SP-820UZ was unveiled 19 months earlier than the TG-3 which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the SP-820UZ matches up versus the TG-3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ & Olympus Tough TG-3. The full galleries are provided at Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery & Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-820UZ over the Olympus TG-3
| SP-820UZ | TG-3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Olympus SP-820UZ
| TG-3 | SP-820UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2014 |  | August 2012 | Newer by 19 months |
Common features in the Olympus SP-820UZ and Olympus TG-3
| SP-820UZ | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen size |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus SP-820UZ features outside measurements of 117mm x 78mm x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") having a weight of 485 grams (1.07 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-3 has specifications of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus TG-3 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the SP-820UZ compared to the TG-3.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SP-820UZ and TG-3 is 69 and 90 respectively.
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions just by checking out specs. The image underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SP-820UZ and TG-3.
All in all, both cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can expect the Olympus TG-3 to show greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged SP-820UZ will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2012-08-21 | 2014-03-31 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 22-896mm (40.7x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.4-5.7 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT-LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 15.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 180 (30, 240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 485 grams (1.07 lbs) | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 117 x 78 x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 photos |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $299 | $350 |