Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic ZS200
69 Imaging
38 Features
29 Overall
34
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e0d4/0e0d4aacb66b19b548b702bfe965d618cb352c1d" alt="Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ front Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/408a9/408a9d2866582d16da93a6b808591f0e980025dc" alt="Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front"
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-896mm (F3.4-5.7) lens
- 485g - 117 x 78 x 93mm
- Launched August 2012
- Superseded the Olympus SP-820UZ
- Refreshed by Olympus SP-820UZ
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Announced February 2018
- Alternative Name is Lumix DC-TZ200
- Older Model is Panasonic ZS100
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic ZS200, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the SP-820UZ (14MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the SP-820UZ (1/2.3") and ZS200 (1") provide different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The SP-820UZ was released 6 years prior to the ZS200 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SP-820UZ being a Compact camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the SP-820UZ matches up against the ZS200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ & Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery & Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-820UZ over the Panasonic ZS200
SP-820UZ | ZS200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus SP-820UZ
ZS200 | SP-820UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | ![]() | August 2012 | Fresher by 66 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 1240k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+780k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SP-820UZ and Panasonic ZS200
SP-820UZ | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus SP-820UZ provides physical dimensions of 117mm x 78mm x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") along with a weight of 485 grams (1.07 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS200 has proportions of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") and a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at the time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the SP-820UZ versus the ZS200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ed00/5ed002c161084f87dbe799c0a38fea3a932d4c0e" alt="Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SP-820UZ and ZS200 is 69 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1fd77/1fd77a7a212433a5e3c256dd82bf3327227624db" alt="Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizing purely by going over specifications. The photograph here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-820UZ and ZS200.
To sum up, both of those cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The SP-820UZ because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Panasonic ZS200 will offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The older SP-820UZ is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25567/25567c3b46604bc451ea9b63b010bcabd52ef10a" alt="Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d063/4d0632954529b5a3b196f5ac829df19f99dc38fa" alt="Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Also called | - | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-08-21 | 2018-02-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 22-896mm (40.7x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.7 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 1,240k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 15.00 m | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 180 (30, 240 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 485g (1.07 lb) | 340g (0.75 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 78 x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 370 shots |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $299 | $800 |