Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic FH22
69 Imaging
38 Features
29 Overall
34
94 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic FH22 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-896mm (F3.4-5.7) lens
- 485g - 117 x 78 x 93mm
- Introduced August 2012
- Old Model is Olympus SP-820UZ
- Later Model is Olympus SP-820UZ
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 170g - 100 x 57 x 27mm
- Launched January 2010
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FS33
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic FH22 Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic FH22, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the SP-820UZ (14MP) and the FH22 (14MP) is very comparable and they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SP-820UZ was launched 2 years later than the FH22 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the SP-820UZ grades against the FH22 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic FH22 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22. The complete galleries are available at Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery & Panasonic FH22 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-820UZ over the Panasonic FH22
| SP-820UZ | FH22 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2012 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 32 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH22 over the Olympus SP-820UZ
| FH22 | SP-820UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SP-820UZ and Panasonic FH22
| SP-820UZ | FH22 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic FH22 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-820UZ provides physical dimensions of 117mm x 78mm x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") along with a weight of 485 grams (1.07 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FH22 has sizing of 100mm x 57mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") having a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic FH22 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at the time. The following is the front view size comparison of the SP-820UZ and the FH22.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the SP-820UZ and FH22 is 69 and 94 respectively.
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic FH22 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to see the contrast in sensor measurements purely by seeing a spec sheet. The visual here should give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-820UZ and FH22.
Clearly, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact resolution so you can expect comparable quality of files though you should factor the launch date of the cameras into account. The more recent SP-820UZ is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic FH22 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Panasonic FH22 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 |
| Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-FS33 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2012-08-21 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 22-896mm (40.7x) | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.7 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 15.00 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 180 (30, 240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 485 gr (1.07 pounds) | 170 gr (0.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 117 x 78 x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") | 100 x 57 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $299 | $200 |