Olympus SP-820UZ vs Ricoh CX1
69 Imaging
37 Features
29 Overall
33
93 Imaging
31 Features
30 Overall
30
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-896mm (F3.4-5.7) lens
- 485g - 117 x 78 x 93mm
- Introduced August 2012
- Succeeded the Olympus SP-820UZ
- Later Model is Olympus SP-820UZ
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2009
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Olympus SP-820UZ vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Olympus SP-820UZ and Ricoh CX1, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the SP-820UZ (14MP) and CX1 (9MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SP-820UZ was revealed 3 years later than the CX1 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the SP-820UZ scores versus the CX1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus SP-820UZ vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ and Ricoh CX1. The full galleries are available at Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery and Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-820UZ over the Ricoh CX1
| SP-820UZ | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2012 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 43 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus SP-820UZ
| CX1 | SP-820UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-820UZ and Ricoh CX1
| SP-820UZ | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SP-820UZ has got outer dimensions of 117mm x 78mm x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") along with a weight of 485 grams (1.07 lbs) while the Ricoh CX1 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SP-820UZ and Ricoh CX1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the SP-820UZ versus the CX1.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the SP-820UZ and CX1 is 69 and 93 respectively.
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizing only by viewing technical specs. The graphic below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-820UZ and CX1.
As you can tell, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Olympus SP-820UZ to provide you with more detail because of its extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more recent SP-820UZ should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | Ricoh CX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | Ricoh CX1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2012-08-21 | 2009-02-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 9MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 22-896mm (40.7x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-5.7 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 15.00 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 180 (30, 240 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 485g (1.07 pounds) | 180g (0.40 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 117 x 78 x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $299 | $299 |