Olympus SP-820UZ vs Ricoh WG-50
69 Imaging
38 Features
29 Overall
34
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-896mm (F3.4-5.7) lens
- 485g - 117 x 78 x 93mm
- Launched August 2012
- Superseded the Olympus SP-820UZ
- Later Model is Olympus SP-820UZ
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2017
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus SP-820UZ vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus SP-820UZ versus Ricoh WG-50, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the SP-820UZ (14MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is relatively close and they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SP-820UZ was brought out 5 years earlier than the WG-50 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a short overview of how the SP-820UZ matches up against the WG-50 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus SP-820UZ vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ & Ricoh WG-50. The entire galleries are available at Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-820UZ over the Ricoh WG-50
| SP-820UZ | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Olympus SP-820UZ
| WG-50 | SP-820UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2017 |  | August 2012 | Fresher by 57 months |
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus SP-820UZ and Ricoh WG-50
| SP-820UZ | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-820UZ has physical dimensions of 117mm x 78mm x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") and a weight of 485 grams (1.07 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-50 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus SP-820UZ versus Ricoh WG-50 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the SP-820UZ vs the WG-50.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the SP-820UZ and WG-50 is 69 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to picture the gap in sensor sizing merely by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-820UZ and WG-50.
Clearly, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You can count on the Ricoh WG-50 to render extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures much more aggressively. The older SP-820UZ will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2012-08-21 | 2017-05-24 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 22-896mm (40.7x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-5.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 15.00 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 180 (30, 240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 485 gr (1.07 lbs) | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 117 x 78 x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 images |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $299 | $280 |