Olympus SP-820UZ vs Samsung WB800F
Portability
69 Imaging
38 Features
29 Overall
34
69 Imaging
38 Features
29 Overall
34
Portability
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
Olympus SP-820UZ
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-896mm (F3.4-5.7) lens
- 485g - 117 x 78 x 93mm
- Released August 2012
- Succeeded the Olympus SP-820UZ
- Renewed by Olympus SP-820UZ
Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus SP-820UZ vs Samsung WB800F Overview
The following is a in depth assessment of the Olympus SP-820UZ and Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the SP-820UZ (14MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SP-820UZ was revealed 4 months prior to the WB800F which means that they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the SP-820UZ matches up versus the WB800F for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus SP-820UZ vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ & Samsung WB800F. The full galleries are available at Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-820UZ over the Samsung WB800F
| SP-820UZ | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Olympus SP-820UZ
| WB800F | SP-820UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SP-820UZ and Samsung WB800F
| SP-820UZ | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2012 |  | January 2013 | Same age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurement |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus SP-820UZ provides exterior measurements of 117mm x 78mm x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") having a weight of 485 grams (1.07 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check out the Olympus SP-820UZ and Samsung WB800F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the SP-820UZ compared to the WB800F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SP-820UZ and WB800F is 69 and 92 respectively.
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to see the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by going through specs. The pic below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-820UZ and WB800F.
All in all, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Samsung WB800F to provide greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots way more aggressively.
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus SP-820UZ Portrait photography factors
Samsung WB800F Portrait photography factors
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
offers face detection focus
lack of manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
features face detect autofocus
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Olympus SP-820UZ Street photography advice
Samsung WB800F Street photography advice
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
more heavy than competition in class (485g)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (218 grams)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Olympus SP-820UZ Sports photography information
Samsung WB800F Sports photography information
amazing zoom range (22-896mm 40.7 x zoom)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
excellent zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
features tracking focus
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Olympus SP-820UZ
Travel photography with Samsung WB800F
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (22mm)
long reach (896mm)
lack of Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (485g)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
lighter than competitors (218 grams)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (23mm)
long zoom (483mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Olympus SP-820UZ Landscape photography details
Samsung WB800F Landscape photography details
reasonably wide (22mm)
decent sized screen (3")
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
lack of Timelapse function
focusing manually
reasonably wide (23mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
lack of Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Olympus SP-820UZ Vlogging details
Samsung WB800F Vlogging details
reasonably wide (22mm)
offers face detection focus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
lack of external microphone jack
more heavy than competition in class (485 grams)
reasonably wide (23mm)
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors (218g)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
lack of mic port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | Samsung WB800F |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-08-21 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 22-896mm (40.7x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.4-5.7 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 15.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 180 (30, 240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 485g (1.07 pounds) | 218g (0.48 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 117 x 78 x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $299 | $300 |
