Olympus SP-820UZ vs Sony A300
69 Imaging
38 Features
29 Overall
34
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e0d4/0e0d4aacb66b19b548b702bfe965d618cb352c1d" alt="Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ front Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1cfb5/1cfb573f9a199713750718c4e753341b4a66f33c" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front"
64 Imaging
49 Features
45 Overall
47
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Sony A300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-896mm (F3.4-5.7) lens
- 485g - 117 x 78 x 93mm
- Revealed August 2012
- Superseded the Olympus SP-820UZ
- Later Model is Olympus SP-820UZ
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Announced January 2008
- Later Model is Sony A330
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Sony A300 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus SP-820UZ versus Sony A300, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the SP-820UZ (14MP) and A300 (10MP) and the SP-820UZ (1/2.3") and A300 (APS-C) come with different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The SP-820UZ was revealed 4 years later than the A300 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus SP-820UZ being a Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go through a full comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the SP-820UZ matches up vs the A300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Sony A300 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ and Sony Alpha DSLR-A300. The full galleries are provided at Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery and Sony A300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-820UZ over the Sony A300
SP-820UZ | A300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2012 | ![]() | January 2008 | Fresher by 56 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Olympus SP-820UZ
A300 | SP-820UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus SP-820UZ and Sony A300
SP-820UZ | A300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-820UZ has exterior measurements of 117mm x 78mm x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 485 grams (1.07 lbs) whilst the Sony A300 has sizing of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).
Check the Olympus SP-820UZ versus Sony A300 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the SP-820UZ versus the A300.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de145/de145c8778e04a0c8194f3be71f04da49a8c908b" alt="Olympus SP-820UZ vs Sony A300 size comparison Olympus SP-820UZ vs Sony A300 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SP-820UZ and A300 is 69 and 64 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3aeb9/3aeb92a33bb44e6a7133e215c29e128fa0293d3b" alt="Olympus SP-820UZ vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-820UZ vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing only by checking technical specs. The visual below may give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-820UZ and A300.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The SP-820UZ having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Olympus SP-820UZ will give you extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images much more aggressively. The younger SP-820UZ should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/503b4/503b430e181a4dba3cdd64119a1d6c9e35f5ca94" alt="Olympus SP-820UZ vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison Olympus SP-820UZ vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8dffe/8dffe2200f8032573ea07ce15e9bb0b4b1dc0baa" alt="Olympus SP-820UZ vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-820UZ vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Sony A300 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2012-08-21 | 2008-01-30 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 22-896mm (40.7x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.7 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 15.00 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 180 (30, 240 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 485g (1.07 lbs) | 632g (1.39 lbs) |
Dimensions | 117 x 78 x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $299 | $0 |