Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus TG-860
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/042ab/042ab9bda5359b24c15525e105c8dbb85792e213" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Announced January 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced February 2015
- Replacement is Olympus TG-870
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus TG-860, both Waterproof digital cameras and they are both offered by Olympus. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and TG-860 (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The Tough-3000 was unveiled 6 years before the TG-860 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the Tough-3000 matches up against the TG-860 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The full galleries are provided at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus TG-860
Tough-3000 | TG-860 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Olympus Tough-3000
TG-860 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2015 | ![]() | January 2010 | More modern by 61 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Olympus TG-860
Tough-3000 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus Tough-3000 enjoys external measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Olympus TG-860 has proportions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus TG-860 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the Tough-3000 against the TG-860.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0acb/f0acbcbfedd5f0974d5a9027057c5ff042cb27c9" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the Tough-3000 and TG-860 is 94 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3750/a375007527ba695d95d84ee597ec139980f4f83d" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizes only by checking specs. The image underneath may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Tough-3000 and TG-860.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-860 to give more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged Tough-3000 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a62f7/a62f7e1a16db263e4e992742881ff69a8b040a84" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8bb4f/8bb4f937f37248ce60000b7511e5f593fc560502" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
Otherwise known as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Announced | 2010-01-07 | 2015-02-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Yes |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 159g (0.35 lb) | 224g (0.49 lb) |
Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $0 | $279 |