Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus TG-310
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de436/de436c1d22864ee65c1aad5da965732699f4570f" alt="Olympus TG-310 front Olympus TG-310 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
Here is a extended review of the Olympus Tough-3000 and Olympus TG-310, both Waterproof cameras and both of them are built by Olympus. The image resolution of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is fairly close and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The Tough-3000 was announced 12 months prior to the TG-310 so they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple view of how the Tough-3000 grades against the TG-310 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Olympus TG-310. The whole galleries are available at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus TG-310
Tough-3000 | TG-310 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Olympus Tough-3000
TG-310 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2011 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 12 months |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Olympus TG-310
Tough-3000 | TG-310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Identical display measurement |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus Tough-3000 has physical dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Olympus TG-310 has specifications of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus Tough-3000 and Olympus TG-310 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the Tough-3000 versus the TG-310.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3192f/3192f656d5f6824bc0ac7a5ce517cb2bfe0f1ae6" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the Tough-3000 and TG-310 is 94 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0aea/c0aeae86ae3741a5300a57eb3848db76917c87fd" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to see the difference in sensor sizing only by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Tough-3000 and TG-310.
Clearly, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-310 to render extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The older Tough-3000 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ae6c/5ae6c885c751f9a17bc2a81a17b41e5464bbf260" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89979/899797e45712d85869dc4f94db3d4f189af44557" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Olympus TG-310 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Olympus TG-310 |
Also Known as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2010-01-07 | 2011-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 4.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 159g (0.35 pounds) | 155g (0.34 pounds) |
Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 150 photos |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $0 | $0 |