Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VG-160
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Announced January 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VG-160, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both manufactured by Olympus. The image resolution of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is very similar and they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Tough-3000 was announced 24 months before the VG-160 making the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the Tough-3000 grades vs the VG-160 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Olympus VG-160. The whole galleries are available at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus VG-160
| Tough-3000 | VG-160 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus Tough-3000
| VG-160 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 24 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Olympus VG-160
| Tough-3000 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus Tough-3000 offers exterior measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-160 has measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Look at the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VG-160 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the Tough-3000 and the VG-160.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Tough-3000 and VG-160 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions only by reviewing specifications. The pic here may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Tough-3000 and VG-160.
Plainly, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Olympus VG-160 to deliver greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged Tough-3000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Olympus VG-160 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Olympus VG-160 |
| Also referred to as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2010-01-07 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 7cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 159g (0.35 lb) | 125g (0.28 lb) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 165 photographs |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $90 |