Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VH-410
94 Imaging
34 Features
26 Overall
30
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VH-410 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Announced January 2010
- Also Known as mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced August 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VH-410 Overview
The following is a thorough comparison of the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VH-410, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both are produced by Olympus. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and VH-410 (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Tough-3000 was introduced 3 years prior to the VH-410 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a short view of how the Tough-3000 scores against the VH-410 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VH-410 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Olympus VH-410. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Olympus VH-410 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus VH-410
| Tough-3000 | VH-410 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Olympus Tough-3000
| VH-410 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2012 | January 2010 | Newer by 31 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Olympus VH-410
| Tough-3000 | VH-410 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VH-410 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus Tough-3000 has got exterior measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Olympus VH-410 has proportions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VH-410 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that moment. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the Tough-3000 vs the VH-410.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Tough-3000 and VH-410 is 94 and 95 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VH-410 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to envision the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading specifications. The pic here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Tough-3000 and VH-410.
Plainly, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Olympus VH-410 to offer you more detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged Tough-3000 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VH-410 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Olympus VH-410 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Olympus VH-410 |
| Also referred to as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2010-01-07 | 2012-08-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 159g (0.35 lbs) | 152g (0.34 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $186 |