Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VH-410
94 Imaging
34 Features
26 Overall
30
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VH-410 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Announced January 2010
- Also Known as mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced August 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VH-410 Overview
The following is a thorough comparison of the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VH-410, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both are produced by Olympus. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and VH-410 (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Tough-3000 was introduced 3 years prior to the VH-410 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a short view of how the Tough-3000 scores against the VH-410 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VH-410 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Olympus VH-410. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Olympus VH-410 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus VH-410
| Tough-3000 | VH-410 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Olympus Tough-3000
| VH-410 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2012 | January 2010 | Newer by 31 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Olympus VH-410
| Tough-3000 | VH-410 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VH-410 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus Tough-3000 has got exterior measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Olympus VH-410 has proportions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VH-410 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that moment. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the Tough-3000 vs the VH-410.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Tough-3000 and VH-410 is 94 and 95 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VH-410 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to envision the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading specifications. The pic here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Tough-3000 and VH-410.
Plainly, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Olympus VH-410 to offer you more detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged Tough-3000 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VH-410 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Olympus VH-410 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Olympus VH-410 |
| Also referred to as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2010-01-07 | 2012-08-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 159g (0.35 lbs) | 152g (0.34 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $186 |