Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-330
94 Imaging
34 Features
26 Overall
30
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released February 2011
- Previous Model is Olympus VR-320
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
The following is a detailed overview of the Olympus Tough-3000 and Olympus VR-330, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is pretty comparable and they possess the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Tough-3000 was launched 13 months prior to the VR-330 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the Tough-3000 scores versus the VR-330 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Olympus VR-330. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus VR-330
| Tough-3000 | VR-330 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus Tough-3000
| VR-330 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2011 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 13 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Olympus VR-330
| Tough-3000 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus Tough-3000 enjoys external dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Olympus VR-330 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus Tough-3000 and Olympus VR-330 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at the time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the Tough-3000 versus the VR-330.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the Tough-3000 and VR-330 is 94 and 94 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by checking out specifications. The pic below might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Tough-3000 and VR-330.
To sum up, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You can expect the Olympus VR-330 to show extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged Tough-3000 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Olympus VR-330 |
| Also Known as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-01-07 | 2011-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 159g (0.35 pounds) | 158g (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $220 |