Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-340
94 Imaging
34 Features
26 Overall
30
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Released January 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
Photography Glossary Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Olympus VR-340, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both are offered by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and VR-340 (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Tough-3000 was unveiled 24 months prior to the VR-340 which makes them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the Tough-3000 grades vs the VR-340 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Olympus VR-340. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus VR-340
| Tough-3000 | VR-340 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Olympus Tough-3000
| VR-340 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 | January 2010 | More recent by 24 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Olympus VR-340
| Tough-3000 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | No manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus Tough-3000 has got outer measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Olympus VR-340 has dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Olympus VR-340 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the Tough-3000 compared to the VR-340.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the Tough-3000 and VR-340 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to envision the contrast between sensor measurements simply by checking specifications. The visual here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Tough-3000 and VR-340.
Plainly, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Olympus VR-340 to give extra detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The older Tough-3000 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Olympus VR-340 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Olympus VR-340 |
| Also referred to as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-01-07 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.0-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 159 gr (0.35 lb) | 125 gr (0.28 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $0 | $130 |