Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-340
94 Imaging
34 Features
26 Overall
30
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Released January 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Olympus VR-340, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both are offered by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and VR-340 (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Tough-3000 was unveiled 24 months prior to the VR-340 which makes them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the Tough-3000 grades vs the VR-340 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Olympus VR-340. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus VR-340
| Tough-3000 | VR-340 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Olympus Tough-3000
| VR-340 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 | January 2010 | More recent by 24 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Olympus VR-340
| Tough-3000 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | No manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus Tough-3000 has got outer measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Olympus VR-340 has dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Olympus VR-340 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the Tough-3000 compared to the VR-340.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the Tough-3000 and VR-340 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to envision the contrast between sensor measurements simply by checking specifications. The visual here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Tough-3000 and VR-340.
Plainly, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Olympus VR-340 to give extra detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The older Tough-3000 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Olympus VR-340 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Olympus VR-340 |
| Also referred to as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-01-07 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.0-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 159 gr (0.35 lb) | 125 gr (0.28 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $0 | $130 |