Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic GX9
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
82 Imaging
60 Features
80 Overall
68
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic GX9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Launched January 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 407g - 124 x 72 x 47mm
- Released February 2018
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic GX9 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Panasonic GX9, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and GX9 (20MP) and the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and GX9 (Four Thirds) feature different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Tough-3000 was unveiled 9 years earlier than the GX9 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic GX9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going through a thorough comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the Tough-3000 matches up vs the GX9 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic GX9 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 and Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9. The full galleries are provided at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery and Panasonic GX9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Panasonic GX9
Tough-3000 | GX9 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic GX9 over the Olympus Tough-3000
GX9 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | January 2010 | More modern by 98 months | |
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1240k | 230k | Sharper screen (+1010k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Panasonic GX9
Tough-3000 | GX9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic GX9 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus Tough-3000 provides physical measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Panasonic GX9 has specifications of 124mm x 72mm x 47mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.9") with a weight of 407 grams (0.90 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Panasonic GX9 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the Tough-3000 and the GX9.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the Tough-3000 and GX9 is 94 and 82 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic GX9 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizes purely by viewing specs. The image here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Tough-3000 and GX9.
All in all, both of those cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Tough-3000 using its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh more difficult and the Panasonic GX9 will provide you with extra detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged Tough-3000 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic GX9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic GX9 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 |
Also Known as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2010-01-07 | 2018-02-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 1,240 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,760 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 6.00 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 159 gr (0.35 pounds) | 407 gr (0.90 pounds) |
Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 124 x 72 x 47mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 shots |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 photos over 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $0 | $1,000 |