Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic FS42
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9979/f9979d6158b07faa33963a04f4938253f5f9ce99" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front"
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Also referred to as mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Raise to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Revealed April 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Panasonic FS42, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and the FS42 (10MP) is relatively similar but the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and FS42 (1/2.5") offer different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The Tough-3000 was brought out 9 months after the FS42 which means that they are of a similar generation. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the Tough-3000 scores versus the FS42 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The entire galleries are available at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery and Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Panasonic FS42
Tough-3000 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2010 | ![]() | April 2009 | More modern by 9 months |
Screen size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus Tough-3000
FS42 | Tough-3000 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Panasonic FS42
Tough-3000 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Olympus Tough-3000 provides external dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Panasonic FS42 has specifications of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Look at the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Panasonic FS42 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the Tough-3000 compared to the FS42.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b186a/b186a952acc37766a70bf2afc748e6323623c78b" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Tough-3000 and FS42 is 94 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/768c4/768c4f4380021afd4f1d370450d9968d459f0a46" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizes only by going over specs. The image underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Tough-3000 and FS42.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Tough-3000 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus Tough-3000 will offer you greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots way more aggressively. The younger Tough-3000 provides a benefit in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ede0a/ede0aad32d733e46aaa701e9ea2c8271ae49ef59" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b77f7/b77f7510b7736e0ca3760a0a3fc9b56d651cee93" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
Also referred to as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2010-01-07 | 2009-04-17 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1000 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 2.5" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 6.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 159 gr (0.35 lbs) | 132 gr (0.29 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $0 | $580 |