Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic LX100
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31


83 Imaging
50 Features
73 Overall
59
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic LX100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Also Known as mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 13MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-75mm (F1.7-2.8) lens
- 393g - 115 x 66 x 55mm
- Announced September 2014
- Replacement is Panasonic LX100 II

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic LX100 Overview
Following is a in depth overview of the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Panasonic LX100, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and the LX100 (13MP) is fairly similar but the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and LX100 (Four Thirds) provide totally different sensor sizing.

The Tough-3000 was manufactured 5 years earlier than the LX100 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic LX100 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the Tough-3000 matches up versus the LX100 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic LX100 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100. The entire galleries are available at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery and Panasonic LX100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Panasonic LX100
Tough-3000 | LX100 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic LX100 over the Olympus Tough-3000
LX100 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2014 | ![]() | January 2010 | More modern by 57 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Panasonic LX100
Tough-3000 | LX100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic LX100 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus Tough-3000 has outer measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Panasonic LX100 has specifications of 115mm x 66mm x 55mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 393 grams (0.87 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Panasonic LX100 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the Tough-3000 and the LX100.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Tough-3000 and LX100 is 94 and 83 respectively.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic LX100 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to see the gap between sensor sizes only by reading specs. The picture here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Tough-3000 and LX100.
All in all, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Tough-3000 featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Panasonic LX100 will offer more detail due to its extra 1MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged Tough-3000 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic LX100 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic LX100 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 |
Also referred to as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2010-01-07 | 2014-09-15 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4112 x 3088 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-75mm (3.1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/1.7-2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,764k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 11.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 7.00 m (with included external flash at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 159 gr (0.35 lbs) | 393 gr (0.87 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 115 x 66 x 55mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 67 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 553 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I) |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $0 | $800 |