Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic LX5
94 Imaging
34 Features
26 Overall
30
88 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic LX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Launched January 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-90mm (F2.0-3.3) lens
- 271g - 110 x 65 x 43mm
- Revealed December 2011
- Old Model is Panasonic LX3
- Renewed by Panasonic LX7
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic LX5 Overview
Following is a detailed overview of the Olympus Tough-3000 and Panasonic LX5, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and the LX5 (10MP) is fairly similar but the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and LX5 (1/1.63") use different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Tough-3000 was released 23 months prior to the LX5 making the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the Tough-3000 grades versus the LX5 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic LX5 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery and Panasonic LX5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Panasonic LX5
| Tough-3000 | LX5 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic LX5 over the Olympus Tough-3000
| LX5 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | December 2011 | January 2010 | More modern by 23 months | |
| Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Panasonic LX5
| Tough-3000 | LX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic LX5 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus Tough-3000 enjoys physical measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Panasonic LX5 has sizing of 110mm x 65mm x 43mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus Tough-3000 and Panasonic LX5 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use at that moment. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the Tough-3000 against the LX5.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the Tough-3000 and LX5 is 94 and 88 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic LX5 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading technical specs. The pic here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Tough-3000 and LX5.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Tough-3000 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh trickier and the Olympus Tough-3000 will offer you more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged Tough-3000 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic LX5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic LX5 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 |
| Otherwise known as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-01-07 | 2011-12-15 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | Venus Engine FHD |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 44.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-90mm (3.8x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.0-3.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 7.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | AVCHD Lite |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 159 grams (0.35 pounds) | 271 grams (0.60 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 110 x 65 x 43mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 41 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 19.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.8 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 132 |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $0 | $294 |