Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic ZS1
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a81b/6a81b74be2fc2f5b005db0ba199900d1cad3b423" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 front"
91 Imaging
33 Features
25 Overall
29
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic ZS1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Released January 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 229g - 103 x 60 x 33mm
- Announced May 2009
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-TZ6
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic ZS1 Overview
Following is a in-depth overview of the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Panasonic ZS1, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and the ZS1 (10MP) is very comparable but the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and ZS1 (1/2.5") feature totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The Tough-3000 was introduced 8 months after the ZS1 and they are of a similar age. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple view of how the Tough-3000 scores vs the ZS1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic ZS1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1. The whole galleries are available at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Panasonic ZS1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Panasonic ZS1
Tough-3000 | ZS1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2010 | ![]() | May 2009 | More modern by 8 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS1 over the Olympus Tough-3000
ZS1 | Tough-3000 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Panasonic ZS1
Tough-3000 | ZS1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equivalent display measurements |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic ZS1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus Tough-3000 offers outside dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS1 has proportions of 103mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 229 grams (0.50 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Panasonic ZS1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the Tough-3000 and the ZS1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e92c6/e92c6d91fb094d2b7243f394d4347cd8044c1050" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic ZS1 size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic ZS1 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Tough-3000 and ZS1 is 94 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42019/42019aafec10c14f0678b877fc4f7ecc57bdbf9a" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic ZS1 top view buttons comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic ZS1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic ZS1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to envision the gap in sensor sizes only by checking out specs. The pic underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Tough-3000 and ZS1.
All in all, both cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Tough-3000 with its larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus Tough-3000 will provide greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos far more aggressively. The more modern Tough-3000 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65fdf/65fdf324f9a7d6b8dd70dfbc15b654eee57ca758" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic ZS1 sensor size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic ZS1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic ZS1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1a70/d1a70ea3ab38d509d81ecd629cdf77f4f1c7a7d3" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic ZS1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic ZS1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic ZS1 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 |
Also called as | mju Tough 3000 | Lumix DMC-TZ6 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2010-01-07 | 2009-05-14 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.3-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 5.30 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 159g (0.35 pounds) | 229g (0.50 pounds) |
Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 103 x 60 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $0 | $0 |