Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic ZS30
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25c20/25c200bbfc081616744826f0a4654558e906b113" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30 front"
92 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic ZS30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Announced January 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 198g - 105 x 59 x 28mm
- Released January 2013
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-TZ40
- Earlier Model is Panasonic ZS25
- Successor is Panasonic ZS35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic ZS30 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Olympus Tough-3000 and Panasonic ZS30, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and ZS30 (18MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The Tough-3000 was announced 4 years before the ZS30 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the Tough-3000 matches up vs the ZS30 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic ZS30 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Panasonic ZS30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Panasonic ZS30
Tough-3000 | ZS30 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS30 over the Olympus Tough-3000
ZS30 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2010 | More recent by 36 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Panasonic ZS30
Tough-3000 | ZS30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic ZS30 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus Tough-3000 provides physical dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS30 has sizing of 105mm x 59mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs).
Compare the Olympus Tough-3000 and Panasonic ZS30 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the Tough-3000 against the ZS30.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12938/12938ced1835a7e74dd339b739aac0d06f0ecbc9" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic ZS30 size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic ZS30 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Tough-3000 and ZS30 is 94 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5367/b536759a0ef984744d3d763fdc93be34fdf4016c" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic ZS30 top view buttons comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic ZS30 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic ZS30 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reviewing specifications. The graphic underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the Tough-3000 and ZS30.
Plainly, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Panasonic ZS30 to offer you extra detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos more aggressively. The older Tough-3000 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3bdc9/3bdc9a465f3b55bd4d75a51703aaed5fc7dce8df" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic ZS30 sensor size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic ZS30 sensor size comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic ZS30 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06bc2/06bc223d38bc1b41a16c69d4acf8eb0413a411f5" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic ZS30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic ZS30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic ZS30 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30 |
Other name | mju Tough 3000 | Lumix DMC-TZ40 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2010-01-07 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 18MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 15 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1200 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 6.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 159 gr (0.35 lb) | 198 gr (0.44 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 105 x 59 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $0 | $250 |