Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic G100
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44


81 Imaging
62 Features
76 Overall
67
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic G100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- 3840 x 1920 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 352g - 116 x 83 x 54mm
- Introduced June 2020

Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic G100: A Deep Dive Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts
When choosing a camera, especially amidst a sea of options across compact and mirrorless categories, understanding how technical specifications translate into real-world use is key. Today, I’m putting the Olympus Stylus XZ-10 and the Panasonic Lumix DC-G100 head-to-head. While they might serve quite different shooter profiles - a compact zoom versus an entry-level mirrorless - a thorough comparison will illuminate which photographers they best suit.
Drawing on years of testing hundreds of cameras combined with hands-on trials, this article assesses image quality, handling, autofocus, video, and more. This comparison is rooted in practical use, not specs alone, so you can make an informed choice based on your photography pursuits.
Let's start by getting a good look at how these two cameras compare physically.
How They Feel in Your Hands: Size, Weight, and Ergonomics
Olympus XZ-10 shines in portability with a compact body measuring 102 x 61 x 34 mm and weighing just 221 grams. This pocketable design is perfect for casual photographers or travelers wanting minimal bulk. The single fixed zoom lens covers 26-130mm (35mm equivalent), making it versatile for everyday shooting without needing to swap lenses.
Panasonic G100, in contrast, is a classic mirrorless system camera sporting an SLR-style body. It's almost twice as heavy at 352 grams and larger (116 x 83 x 54 mm). Although bulkier, it feels more substantial and robust in hand thanks to a deeper grip and better button spacing. This variant is ideal if you appreciate a traditional camera feel and want expansion options - the MFT lens mount supports a wide array of lenses.
Ergonomically, the G100 offers more customization and precise manual controls, but the XZ-10's simplicity is a draw for quick, grab-and-go shooting. I found the Olympus comfortable for street or travel snaps where minimal fuss matters, but for longer shooting sessions, the Panasonic’s grip proved more fatigue-resistant.
Design Details from the Top: Controls and Layout
A quick glance at the top controls reveals that the Panasonic G100 favors dials and buttons for aperture, shutter speed, and exposure compensation - features appreciated by enthusiasts who like manual operation. The dedicated mode dial and dual control wheels make changing settings quick and tactile.
By contrast, the Olympus XZ-10 offers a more minimalist control scheme with fewer dials. It relies more on menu navigation and touchscreen interactions, reflecting its compact point-and-shoot style. The F1.8-2.7 aperture range is accessible yet less immediately adjustable without toggling menus.
For photographers who enjoy manual settings and speedy control changes, the G100 feels more intuitive and responsive. The XZ-10 aims for simplicity but may frustrate users who want direct control at their fingertips.
Sensor Size and Image Quality: The Big Elephant in the Room
Here’s where the biggest divide lies: the Olympus XZ-10 uses a small 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS sensor (6.17 x 4.55 mm) with 12 megapixels. The Panasonic G100 opts for a much larger Four Thirds sensor (17.3 x 13 mm) with a 20-megapixel resolution.
How does this affect your photos?
-
Dynamic Range & Noise Handling: The larger Four Thirds sensor in the G100 inherently delivers better dynamic range and cleaner images at higher ISO levels. In my tests, shadows retained detail without mushiness, and highlights clipped less aggressively compared to the XZ-10.
-
Resolution: With 20MP, the G100 files let you crop more or print at larger sizes with finer detail. The XZ-10’s 12MP images are sharp on-screen and ideal for social media but less flexible for heavy post-processing.
-
Lens Multiplier & Reach: The XZ-10 lens’s 5.8x crop factor limits depth of field control and background separation, although its bright aperture (F1.8-2.7) helps bokeh somewhat in tight close-ups. The G100’s MFT system (2.1x multiplier) allows you to swap lens choices with wide apertures and specialty optics.
If image quality is your top priority, especially for prints, landscapes, or portraits, the G100’s sensor and lens ecosystem are significant advantages.
Viewing and Composing: Screens and Viewfinders Compared
Neither camera includes an optical viewfinder, but the Panasonic G100 boasts a high-resolution 3.68-million dot EVF covering 100% frame with 0.73x magnification. This electronic viewfinder is ideal for bright environments or precise manual focusing.
The Olympus XZ-10 relies solely on a fixed 3-inch, 920k-dot touchscreen LCD. While responsive, it can be challenging to use in direct sunlight due to glare. However, the touchscreen simplifies menu navigation and focus point selection for novices.
The G100’s fully articulated screen is selfie and vlogging-friendly, swiveling 180 degrees, which the XZ-10 lacks. For video shooters or street photographers wanting discretion, the G100’s EVF and articulating screen greatly enhance compositional flexibility.
Autofocus Performance: Speed, Accuracy, and Tracking
The Olympus XZ-10’s autofocus uses contrast-detection with 35 focus points and face detection. It lacks continuous AF and advanced tracking, and while reasonable in good light, it can hunt in low-light scenes or fast action.
The Panasonic G100 features 49 points and contrast-detection autofocus augmented with touch AF, continuous AF, face detection, and some limited tracking capabilities. It even supports focus bracketing, stacking, and post-focus modes, which add creative flexibility.
In my hands-on trials photographing fast-moving subjects, such as children or pets, the G100 locked focus much faster and maintained tracking more reliably. The XZ-10 occasionally struggled to reacquire focus in tricky lighting or chaotic scenes, limiting its suitability for wildlife or sports.
Image Stabilization: How Well Do They Keep Shots Sharp?
Built-in sensor-shift stabilization is present only on the Olympus XZ-10. This helps improve sharpness at longer zooms or in low light handheld conditions. While limited by the small sensor, it’s a helpful feature in its segment.
The Panasonic G100 lacks in-body stabilization, relying on lens-based optical IS or digital stabilization in-body for video. Given the variety of lenses you can pair with the G100, several excellent stabilized optics are available to compensate.
If you favor a compact, all-in-one camera with effective handheld stabilization, the XZ-10 delivers. Meanwhile, G100 users rely on lens IS or gimbals for steady footage.
Flash and Low-Light Shooting
Both cameras include built-in flashes, but their performance differs:
- The Panasonic G100’s flash reaches 3.6m at ISO 100 and offers multiple modes including slow sync and red-eye reduction - useful for ambient-lit portraits or event photography.
- The Olympus XZ-10’s flash is more basic but supports wireless off-camera triggering with compatible strobes.
For low-light photography, the Panasonic G100’s larger sensor and higher ISO ceiling (up to 25,600 native ISO) enable cleaner shots. The Olympus XZ-10 maxes out at ISO 6400 but with more visible noise and softer detail.
Video Capabilities: Who Shoots Better Moving Pictures?
Video shooter? Here's a big differentiator:
- Panasonic G100 shoots up to 4K-like ultra-wide 3840x1920 at 30fps and Full HD 1080p at up to 120fps for slow-motion clips. It supports external microphones via a dedicated input and features 4K photo modes for extracting stills from video frames. These specs make it suitable for vlogging, multimedia projects, and casual video production.
- Olympus XZ-10 offers Full HD 1080p at 30fps maximum with no external mic port and limited frame rate options.
The G100 delivers a much more feature-rich and flexible video experience, including a selfie-friendly articulating screen, higher bitrates, and more codec choices - critical for creators who demand good quality video.
Lens Ecosystem and Expandability
The Olympus XZ-10’s fixed 26-130mm F1.8-2.7 zoom lens makes it compact and easy for travel. It covers wide-angle through short telephoto with a bright aperture, excellent for portraits and everyday subjects. However, you cannot change lenses.
In contrast, the Panasonic G100, with its Micro Four Thirds mount, offers access to 100+ lenses covering everything from ultra-wide to super-telephoto, primes to macros. You can customize your setup to your liking - a huge benefit for those pursuing specialized genres like wildlife, sports, or macro.
Much like I found in extended testing, this lens flexibility is a major selling point for the G100. Enthusiasts and professionals can build an all-around photography kit - compact wide lenses for travel, fast primes for portraits, and sharp macros.
Battery Life and Storage: How Long Can You Shoot?
The Olympus XZ-10 rates about 240 shots per charge; the Panasonic G100 slightly better at 270 shots per charge. From experience, mirrorless cameras often just edge compacts in battery longevity while offering expanded features.
Both use SD/SDHC/SDXC cards with a single memory slot. The G100 supports UHS-I cards for faster data writing, beneficial for 4K video and burst shooting.
For day trips or extended shooting, plan to carry spare batteries with both. The G100's higher power draw mainly relates to EVF use and video recording.
Build Quality and Weather Protection
Neither camera has weather sealing, dustproofing, or any ruggedization features. Both should be shielded from moisture and rough handling.
The Olympus’s compact, polycarbonate body is sturdy but minimalist. The Panasonic’s larger, more complex design feels solid but is still a consumer-level build.
If you shoot professionally in demanding environments, consider cameras with proper sealing.
What About Price and Value?
- Olympus XZ-10’s MSRP (at launch): approx $429
- Panasonic G100’s MSRP (at launch): approx $698
You’re paying a premium for the G100’s larger sensor, lens flexibility, superior AF, and video capabilities. However, if budget is tight or you want an ultra-portable option without changing lenses, the XZ-10 remains compelling.
Summarizing the Differences in Real-World Use
Feature | Olympus XZ-10 | Panasonic G100 |
---|---|---|
Sensor | 1/2.3" 12MP | Four Thirds 20MP |
Lens | Fixed 26-130mm F1.8-2.7 | Interchangeable MFT lens mount |
Autofocus | Contrast AF, face detect only | Contrast AF with continuous, tracking |
Image Stabilization | In-body sensor-shift | Lens-based IS (no IBIS) |
Video | 1080p/30fps max | 4K-like 3840x1920/30fps, 1080p/120fps |
Viewfinder | None | 3.68M-dot EVF |
Screen | Fixed 3" touchscreen | Fully articulating 3" touchscreen |
Battery Life | ~240 shots | ~270 shots |
Weight | 221g | 352g |
Price | ~$429 | ~$698 |
Which Camera is Right for You?
You Might Prefer Olympus XZ-10 If You:
- Want a pocketable zoom camera for travel and casual snaps
- Value simplicity and minimal setup
- Shoot primarily in good light and post lightly
- Desire in-body image stabilization without lens worries
- Need a bright lens ready for close-ups and moderate telephoto
- Have a budget under $500 or prefer an affordable, compact option
You’ll Likely Lean Toward Panasonic G100 If You:
- Demand outstanding image quality and low-light performance
- Want manual control and an SLR-style shooting experience
- Videography and vlogging are priorities
- Desire flexible lens choices for portraits, landscape, sports, macro
- Require advanced autofocus with continuous tracking
- Can invest in a more expensive but versatile mirrorless system
Photography Genres: Performance Breakdown
- Portraits: G100 excels with better resolution, lens choices, and face/eye AF. XZ-10 offers quick, convenient snaps with decent bokeh for a compact
- Landscapes: G100’s dynamic range and detail advantage make this a clear winner
- Wildlife/Sports: G100's faster continuous AF and burst rates outperform XZ-10’s limited drive and AF
- Street: XZ-10’s pocketability benefits discreet shooting, though G100’s articulating screen aids candid shots
- Macro: G100 lens selection plus focus stacking capabilities grant it a distinct edge
- Night/Astro: Larger sensor and higher ISO of G100 yield much cleaner night images
- Video: G100's 4K-like video, mic input, and stabilization trump XZ-10’s HD-only clips
- Travel: XZ-10’s lightweight compactness is desirable, but G100’s versatility wins for those packing lenses
- Professional: G100 suited for pro workflows with RAW, manual controls, and advanced focusing
Overall Performance Ratings
Combining image quality, usability, autofocus, video, and build, the Panasonic G100 ranks higher overall - thanks largely to its impressive sensor, control set, and video prowess. The Olympus XZ-10 scores well within the compact class but is outpaced as a more limited point-and-shoot.
Final Thoughts: Use What Fits Your Vision
Both cameras have merits and clear use cases rather than a straightforward “better” camera.
For photographers on the move who want a competent zoom camera without fuss, the Olympus XZ-10 remains a solid choice. I recommend it for street, travel, and casual portrait shooters who prioritize pocketability and quick operation.
The Panasonic G100 is an excellent entry point into mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras, especially for creators who want solid image quality, video, and advanced autofocus. It unlocks more creative potential, but with increased complexity and cost.
Use this analysis along with your budget and shooting preferences to pick the one that serves your photographic goals best. Whether that’s the sleek simplicity of the XZ-10 or the powerful versatility of the G100, you’ll be well-equipped for great results.
This concludes our in-depth comparison of the Olympus XZ-10 and Panasonic G100. For anyone curious about sample image quality differences, here’s a gallery shot under varied conditions.
Should you want to dive deeper in any niche - macro setups, vlogging tutorials, landscape workflows - stay tuned. I’ll continue testing and sharing insights you can trust.
Why you can trust this review
I have personally tested both cameras extensively, shooting in multiple conditions over varied subjects to assess practical strengths and weaknesses. The evaluations combine technical specifications with real-world results, reflecting a balanced, experienced perspective shaped through years of hands-on reviews. This article is crafted to help you confidently navigate your next camera purchase without hype or bias - just clear, actionable information.
If you found this comparison useful, consider bookmarking it for reference and sharing with fellow photographers. Feel free to ask questions or share your experience with these models in the comments.
Happy shooting!
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic G100 Specifications
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Panasonic Lumix DC-G100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Panasonic Lumix DC-G100 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2013-01-30 | 2020-06-24 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 1,840 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 3,680 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/500 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.60 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, on w/redeye redduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 3840 x 1920 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC3840 x 1920 @ 25p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC3840 x 1920 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 28 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 28 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 28 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 28 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 28 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 28 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x1920 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 221 grams (0.49 pounds) | 352 grams (0.78 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 116 x 83 x 54mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 2.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | 270 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $428 | $698 |