Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-1
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa135/aa1355992173e4aa3e49b43ef3ec8d4d72dcf8b1" alt="Pentax K-1 front Pentax K-1 front"
55 Imaging
75 Features
82 Overall
77
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Launched January 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 36MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 204800
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 1010g - 137 x 110 x 86mm
- Revealed February 2016
- Later Model is Pentax K-1 II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-1 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-1, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and K-1 (36MP) and the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and K-1 (Full frame) provide different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The Tough-3000 was released 7 years earlier than the K-1 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-1 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a short overview of how the Tough-3000 matches up against the K-1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 and Pentax K-1. The complete galleries are available at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery and Pentax K-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Pentax K-1
Tough-3000 | K-1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax K-1 over the Olympus Tough-3000
K-1 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2016 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 74 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display size | 3.2" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+807k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Pentax K-1
Tough-3000 | K-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-1 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus Tough-3000 has got outside dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-1 has proportions of 137mm x 110mm x 86mm (5.4" x 4.3" x 3.4") along with a weight of 1010 grams (2.23 lbs).
Compare the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the Tough-3000 compared to the K-1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16d14/16d1497d6689ecef639e421ca4bc6dc080466fc0" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-1 size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-1 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Tough-3000 and K-1 is 94 and 55 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4c6a/e4c6aab9fc4636f82d56297ef99ab10debe071a6" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-1 top view buttons comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to picture the gap between sensor sizing only by reading specifications. The visual underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Tough-3000 and K-1.
To sum up, each of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Tough-3000 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Pentax K-1 will offer greater detail as a result of its extra 24 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The older Tough-3000 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eecb0/eecb0ee4bebbef6687c51abd2a7e4c9e46e8537a" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-1 sensor size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f734/8f734cf541c6f6643c78a93b6d8c9d62090293c3" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-1 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Pentax K-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Pentax K-1 |
Also called | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2010-01-07 | 2016-02-17 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 36MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 7360 x 4912 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 204800 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 33 |
Cross type focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3.2 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,037k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 4.4 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto Flash Discharge, Auto Flash + Red-eye Reduction, Flash On, Flash On + Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync + Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, Contrast-control-sync, High-speed sync, Wireless sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/200 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 159 gr (0.35 pounds) | 1010 gr (2.23 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 137 x 110 x 86mm (5.4" x 4.3" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 96 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 25.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 14.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 3280 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 760 photos |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I) |
Storage slots | One | Dual |
Pricing at launch | $0 | $1,499 |