Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-3 II
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
59 Imaging
66 Features
84 Overall
73
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-3 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Also Known as mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 51200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 800g - 131 x 100 x 77mm
- Launched April 2015
- Previous Model is Pentax K-3
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-3 II Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Pentax K-3 II, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and K-3 II (24MP) and the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and K-3 II (APS-C) boast totally different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Tough-3000 was launched 6 years earlier than the K-3 II which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-3 II being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summary of how the Tough-3000 scores versus the K-3 II with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-3 II Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 and Pentax K-3 II. The complete galleries are available at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery and Pentax K-3 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Pentax K-3 II
Tough-3000 | K-3 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax K-3 II over the Olympus Tough-3000
K-3 II | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2015 | January 2010 | Newer by 64 months | |
Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3.2" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Sharper display (+807k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Pentax K-3 II
Tough-3000 | K-3 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-3 II Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus Tough-3000 has outer measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-3 II has dimensions of 131mm x 100mm x 77mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") and a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Pentax K-3 II in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the Tough-3000 and the K-3 II.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Tough-3000 and K-3 II is 94 and 59 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-3 II Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by checking out technical specs. The picture here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Tough-3000 and K-3 II.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The Tough-3000 because of its smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF harder and the Pentax K-3 II will produce more detail utilizing its extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged Tough-3000 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-3 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-3 II Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Pentax K-3 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Pentax K-3 II |
Also called as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2010-01-07 | 2015-04-23 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Prime III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 6016 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 51200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 27 |
Cross type focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3.2" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,037k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 8.3 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto Flash Discharge, Auto Flash + Red-eye Reduction, Flash On, Flash On + Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync + Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, Contrast-control-sync, High-speed sync, Wireless sync (available with dedicated external flash) |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Optional |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 159 grams (0.35 pounds) | 800 grams (1.76 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 131 x 100 x 77mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 80 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1106 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 720 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | Two |
Pricing at launch | $0 | $829 |