Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-5 II
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
60 Imaging
58 Features
82 Overall
67
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-5 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Launched January 2010
- Also Known as mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Push to 51200)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 760g - 131 x 97 x 73mm
- Introduced June 2013
- Succeeded the Pentax K-5
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-5 II Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Pentax K-5 II, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and K-5 II (16MP) and the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and K-5 II (APS-C) posses different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Tough-3000 was released 4 years earlier than the K-5 II which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-5 II being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summation of how the Tough-3000 scores vs the K-5 II with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-5 II Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Pentax K-5 II. The complete galleries are available at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Pentax K-5 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Pentax K-5 II
Tough-3000 | K-5 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax K-5 II over the Olympus Tough-3000
K-5 II | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2013 | January 2010 | More modern by 41 months | |
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Pentax K-5 II
Tough-3000 | K-5 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-5 II Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus Tough-3000 features external measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Pentax K-5 II has dimensions of 131mm x 97mm x 73mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 2.9") along with a weight of 760 grams (1.68 lbs).
Examine the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Pentax K-5 II in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the Tough-3000 vs the K-5 II.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Tough-3000 and K-5 II is 94 and 60 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-5 II Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes just by researching technical specs. The pic below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Tough-3000 and K-5 II.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Tough-3000 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh trickier and the Pentax K-5 II will result in more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged Tough-3000 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-5 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-5 II Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Pentax K-5 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Pentax K-5 II |
Also referred to as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2010-01-07 | 2013-06-04 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | Prime II |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.61x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync, High speed, Rear curtain and Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (25 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (25, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 159g (0.35 pounds) | 760g (1.68 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 131 x 97 x 73mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 82 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 14.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1235 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 980 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $0 | $830 |