Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-50
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/006ea/006eadf258c1845fa0cf529af15aba3f0081fb3d" alt="Pentax K-50 front Pentax K-50 front"
63 Imaging
58 Features
65 Overall
60
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Announced January 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 51600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 650g - 130 x 97 x 71mm
- Announced November 2013
- Succeeded the Pentax K-30
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-50 Overview
In this article, we will be evaluating the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Pentax K-50, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and K-50 (16MP) and the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and K-50 (APS-C) come with different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The Tough-3000 was revealed 4 years earlier than the K-50 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-50 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a brief summation of how the Tough-3000 grades against the K-50 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-50 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Pentax K-50. The full galleries are available at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Pentax K-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Pentax K-50
Tough-3000 | K-50 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax K-50 over the Olympus Tough-3000
K-50 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | November 2013 | ![]() | January 2010 | More modern by 47 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Pentax K-50
Tough-3000 | K-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-50 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus Tough-3000 has outer dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Pentax K-50 has proportions of 130mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") along with a weight of 650 grams (1.43 lbs).
Check the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Pentax K-50 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using during that time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the Tough-3000 versus the K-50.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92181/921811a75a8bc23ced70c2c64ec5e8a9e733b297" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-50 size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-50 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Tough-3000 and K-50 is 94 and 63 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a005e/a005ef689f617b1ba8e90e38bc13b29fc2c21ca0" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-50 top view buttons comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-50 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-50 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes only by going through a spec sheet. The picture below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Tough-3000 and K-50.
As you can see, both cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Tough-3000 using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Pentax K-50 will show extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged Tough-3000 will be behind in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/448a7/448a7f32ed45e8ebf7831bb437165451d474197e" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-50 sensor size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-50 sensor size comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-50 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/714c1/714c16add11e8d8c9f9308be54ddda406321d463" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-50 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Pentax K-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Pentax K-50 |
Other name | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2010-01-07 | 2013-11-27 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | PRIME M |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4928 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 51600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Cross focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD monitor with brightness/color adjustment and AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.61x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync, Slow Sync+Redeye, Trailing Curtain Sync, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60,50,30,25,24 fps), 640 x 424 (30,25,24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 159g (0.35 lbs) | 650g (1.43 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 130 x 97 x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.0 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1120 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 410 pictures |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI109 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $0 | $610 |