Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-r
94 Imaging
34 Features
26 Overall
30
67 Imaging
52 Features
52 Overall
52
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-r Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Announced January 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 598g - 125 x 97 x 68mm
- Announced March 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-r Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-r, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and the K-r (12MP) is relatively comparable but the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and K-r (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Tough-3000 was unveiled 14 months prior to the K-r which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-r being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the Tough-3000 scores vs the K-r with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-r Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Pentax K-r. The full galleries are available at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Pentax K-r Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Pentax K-r
| Tough-3000 | K-r |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax K-r over the Olympus Tough-3000
| K-r | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2011 | January 2010 | Newer by 14 months | |
| Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Pentax K-r
| Tough-3000 | K-r | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-r Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus Tough-3000 features physical dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Pentax K-r has measurements of 125mm x 97mm x 68mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 2.7") and a weight of 598 grams (1.32 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-r in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the Tough-3000 against the K-r.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Tough-3000 and K-r is 94 and 67 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-r Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to envision the gap in sensor dimensions simply by checking out specs. The picture here might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Tough-3000 and K-r.
All in all, each of these cameras have the same MP albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The Tough-3000 has the smaller sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower DOF tougher. The more aged Tough-3000 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-r Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-r Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Pentax K-r | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Pentax K-r |
| Also called | mju Tough 3000 | - |
| Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Announced | 2010-01-07 | 2011-03-11 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | Prime II |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 2848 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 200 |
| RAW files | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | - | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/6000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Trailing Curtain Sync, High-Speed Sync and Wireless Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (25 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 159g (0.35 lbs) | 598g (1.32 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 125 x 97 x 68mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 2.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 72 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.9 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 755 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 470 photos |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | D-LI109,4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $0 | $1,100 |