Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-r
94 Imaging
34 Features
26 Overall
30
 
               
              67 Imaging
52 Features
52 Overall
52
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-r Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Announced January 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 598g - 125 x 97 x 68mm
- Announced March 2011
 Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide        Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-r Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-r, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and the K-r (12MP) is relatively comparable but the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and K-r (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizing.
 Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Tough-3000 was unveiled 14 months prior to the K-r which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-r being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the Tough-3000 scores vs the K-r with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
 Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes        Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-r Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Pentax K-r. The full galleries are available at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Pentax K-r Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Pentax K-r
| Tough-3000 | K-r | 
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax K-r over the Olympus Tough-3000
| K-r | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2011 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 14 months | 
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | 
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) | 
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Pentax K-r
| Tough-3000 | K-r | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen | 
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen | 
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-r Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus Tough-3000 features physical dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Pentax K-r has measurements of 125mm x 97mm x 68mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 2.7") and a weight of 598 grams (1.32 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-r in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the Tough-3000 against the K-r.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Tough-3000 and K-r is 94 and 67 respectively.
 
          Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-r Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to envision the gap in sensor dimensions simply by checking out specs. The picture here might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Tough-3000 and K-r.
All in all, each of these cameras have the same MP albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The Tough-3000 has the smaller sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower DOF tougher. The more aged Tough-3000 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
 
          Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-r Screen and ViewFinder
 
         President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban        Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
 Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
 Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
 Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
 Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
 Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
 Photography Glossary
Photography Glossary
        
                
        Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-r Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Pentax K-r | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax | 
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Pentax K-r | 
| Also called | mju Tough 3000 | - | 
| Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR | 
| Announced | 2010-01-07 | 2011-03-11 | 
| Body design | Compact | Compact SLR | 
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | Prime II | 
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS | 
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C | 
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm | 
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 372.9mm² | 
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels | 
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 | 
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 2848 | 
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 | 
| Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 | 
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 200 | 
| RAW files | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | - | 100 | 
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 | 
| Cross focus points | - | 9 | 
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 | 
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - | 
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - | 
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | - | 
| Total lenses | - | 151 | 
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 | 
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type | 
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches | 
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 921k dot | 
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD monitor | 
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) | 
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent | 
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x | 
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s | 
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/6000s | 
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s | 
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes | 
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Trailing Curtain Sync, High-Speed Sync and Wireless Sync | 
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180s | 
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (25 fps) | 
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 | 
| Video format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG | 
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None | 
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | 
| GPS | None | Optional | 
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 159g (0.35 lbs) | 598g (1.32 lbs) | 
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 125 x 97 x 68mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 2.7") | 
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 72 | 
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.9 | 
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 | 
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 755 | 
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 470 photos | 
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack | 
| Battery model | - | D-LI109,4 x AA | 
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | 
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC | 
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 | 
| Price at launch | $0 | $1,100 | 


