Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-x
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2959/b2959208e447dba4f569f63d7fd2c62d2a4ed005" alt="Pentax K-x front Pentax K-x front"
69 Imaging
52 Features
47 Overall
50
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-x Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Push to 12800)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 580g - 123 x 92 x 68mm
- Released December 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-x Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus Tough-3000 and Pentax K-x, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and the K-x (12MP) is pretty similar but the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and K-x (APS-C) posses different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The Tough-3000 was announced at a similar time to the K-x which means that they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-x being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short view of how the Tough-3000 scores versus the K-x when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-x Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 and Pentax K-x. The whole galleries are available at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery and Pentax K-x Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Pentax K-x
Tough-3000 | K-x |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax K-x over the Olympus Tough-3000
K-x | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Pentax K-x
Tough-3000 | K-x | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2010 | ![]() | December 2009 | Similar generation |
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equal screen dimensions |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-x Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus Tough-3000 offers outside dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Pentax K-x has measurements of 123mm x 92mm x 68mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs).
See the Olympus Tough-3000 and Pentax K-x in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the Tough-3000 and the K-x.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d007/6d007b6411afc8eaed0eb9f95773cd505cc33a98" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-x size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-x size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Tough-3000 and K-x is 94 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a1d3/0a1d3bb0671d97d03611a413d2e8651026b45727" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-x top view buttons comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-x top view buttons comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-x Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizes only by reading specifications. The picture below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the Tough-3000 and K-x.
Plainly, each of these cameras have the same megapixels albeit different sensor sizes. The Tough-3000 features the tinier sensor which should make obtaining shallower depth of field tougher.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02296/0229666e84f722a18c94cd0c522c12927440e306" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-x sensor size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-x sensor size comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-x Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf847/bf84780f20a7888c68b238e12cdc5eb0b832add3" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-x Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-x Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-x Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Pentax K-x | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Pentax K-x |
Also called as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2010-01-07 | 2009-12-23 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Prime |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 2848 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 16.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear curtain, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 416 (24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 159 grams (0.35 pounds) | 580 grams (1.28 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 123 x 92 x 68mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 2.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 72 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 811 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 1900 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $0 | $600 |