Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax MX-1
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31


84 Imaging
37 Features
60 Overall
46
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax MX-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 391g - 122 x 61 x 51mm
- Launched July 2013

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax MX-1 Overview
Below is a in-depth review of the Olympus Tough-3000 and Pentax MX-1, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and the MX-1 (12MP) is relatively similar but the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and MX-1 (1/1.7") offer totally different sensor sizes.

The Tough-3000 was introduced 4 years before the MX-1 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a simple view of how the Tough-3000 matches up vs the MX-1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax MX-1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Pentax MX-1. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Pentax MX-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Pentax MX-1
Tough-3000 | MX-1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax MX-1 over the Olympus Tough-3000
MX-1 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2013 | ![]() | January 2010 | More recent by 42 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Pentax MX-1
Tough-3000 | MX-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax MX-1 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus Tough-3000 offers external dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Pentax MX-1 has sizing of 122mm x 61mm x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 391 grams (0.86 lbs).
Check the Olympus Tough-3000 and Pentax MX-1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at that moment. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the Tough-3000 against the MX-1.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Tough-3000 and MX-1 is 94 and 84 respectively.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax MX-1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to envision the difference between sensor measurements purely by reading specs. The visual here will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Tough-3000 and MX-1.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras come with the identical MP albeit not the same sensor measurements. The Tough-3000 has the tinier sensor which will make getting shallower depth of field more difficult. The older Tough-3000 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax MX-1 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax MX-1 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Pentax MX-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Pentax MX-1 |
Other name | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2010-01-07 | 2013-07-01 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 12.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Speed sync, Trailing Curtain sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 159 grams (0.35 lbs) | 391 grams (0.86 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 122 x 61 x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 208 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 photos |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-Li-106 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $0 | $400 |