Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh CX2
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Released August 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh CX2, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and CX2 (9MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Tough-3000 was unveiled 5 months later than the CX2 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short summation of how the Tough-3000 grades vs the CX2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Ricoh CX2. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Ricoh CX2
| Tough-3000 | CX2 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus Tough-3000
| CX2 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Ricoh CX2
| Tough-3000 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2010 |  | August 2009 | Same age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus Tough-3000 has got outside measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX2 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Check out the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh CX2 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select during that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the Tough-3000 vs the CX2.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Tough-3000 and CX2 is 94 and 93 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements simply by researching specifications. The graphic underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Tough-3000 and CX2.
Plainly, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size but different MP. You can expect to see the Olympus Tough-3000 to result in extra detail having an extra 3MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Ricoh CX2 |
| Otherwise known as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-01-07 | 2009-08-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 9MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 159g (0.35 pounds) | 185g (0.41 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $0 | $341 |