Clicky

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR

Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
26
Overall
31
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front
 
Ricoh GR front
Portability
90
Imaging
57
Features
54
Overall
55

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs

Olympus Tough-3000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
  • Announced January 2010
  • Alternate Name is mju Tough 3000
Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8) lens
  • 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
  • Revealed April 2013
  • New Model is Ricoh GR II
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Overview

Here is a in-depth assessment of the Olympus Tough-3000 and Ricoh GR, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and GR (16MP) and the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) posses totally different sensor size.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The Tough-3000 was brought out 4 years earlier than the GR and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short summation of how the Tough-3000 matches up versus the GR in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Ricoh GR

 Tough-3000 GR 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Olympus Tough-3000

 GR Tough-3000 
RevealedApril 2013January 2010Fresher by 39 months
Manually focus Very accurate focusing
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1230k230kSharper display (+1000k dot)

Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Ricoh GR

 Tough-3000 GR 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither features Touch friendly display

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to carry your camera often, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus Tough-3000 enjoys external measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Ricoh GR has proportions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Examine the Olympus Tough-3000 and Ricoh GR in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the Tough-3000 against the GR.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Tough-3000 and GR is 94 and 90 respectively.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR top view buttons comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is hard to see the difference between sensor sizing just by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the Tough-3000 and GR.

As you can see, the 2 cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Tough-3000 featuring a tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Ricoh GR will give you greater detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images more aggressively. The older Tough-3000 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR sensor size comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh GR Portrait photography highlights
21
manual focus not available
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
74
you can focus manually
flash sync is higher than normal (1/4,000 seconds)
good megapixels (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh GR as a Street photography camera
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
74
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
lighter than average in class (245g)
very good ISO range (25,600)
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Sports photography details
Ricoh GR Sports photography details
36
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking focus
weather sealing
slow frames per second (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
45
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
fixed focal length (28mm)
very slow continuous shooting (4.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
lacks phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Travel photography advice
Ricoh GR Travel photography advice
61
weather sealing
has built in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse function
megapixel count low (12MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
71
lighter than average in class (245 grams)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
does not have selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Landscape photography advice
Ricoh GR Landscape photography advice
35
relatively wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
no manual mode
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
missing Timelapse function
61
you can focus manually
screen is a good size (3 inches)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
very good ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not have image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Vlogging features
Ricoh GR Vlogging features
28
relatively wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing microphone jack
30
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average in class (245 grams)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not have selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
lack of external mic port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus Tough-3000 and Ricoh GR
 Olympus Stylus Tough-3000Ricoh GR
General Information
Make Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 Ricoh GR
Otherwise known as mju Tough 3000 -
Class Waterproof Large Sensor Compact
Announced 2010-01-07 2013-04-17
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 23.7 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 372.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 3968 x 2976 4928 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 1600 25600
Minimum native ISO 64 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-102mm (3.6x) 28mm (1x)
Highest aperture f/3.5-5.1 f/2.8
Macro focusing distance 2cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.9 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7" 3"
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 1,230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 300 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 1.0 frames per sec 4.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.00 m 5.40 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in -
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync - 1/4000 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4 MPEG-4
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 159g (0.35 pounds) 245g (0.54 pounds)
Physical dimensions 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 78
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.6
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 13.5
DXO Low light rating not tested 972
Other
Battery life - 290 shots
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - DB65
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 seconds) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal SD, SDHC, SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Retail price $0 $971