Clicky

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital III

Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
26
Overall
31
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital III front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs

Olympus Tough-3000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
  • Launched January 2010
  • Other Name is mju Tough 3000
Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Introduced July 2009
  • Renewed by Ricoh GR Digital IV
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview

On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital III, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and the GR Digital III (10MP) is relatively comparable but the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") posses totally different sensor sizing.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The Tough-3000 was announced 6 months after the GR Digital III and they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the Tough-3000 grades vs the GR Digital III when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Ricoh GR Digital III

 Tough-3000 GR Digital III 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Olympus Tough-3000

 GR Digital III Tough-3000 
Focus manually More accurate focus
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kClearer screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Ricoh GR Digital III

 Tough-3000 GR Digital III 
IntroducedJanuary 2010July 2009Same generation
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus Tough-3000 has got outer dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital III has measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).

See the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital III in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the Tough-3000 versus the GR Digital III.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Tough-3000 and GR Digital III is 94 and 92 respectively.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizes just by seeing a spec sheet. The image underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Tough-3000 and GR Digital III.

Clearly, both of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Tough-3000 having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Olympus Tough-3000 will provide extra detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus Tough-3000
Portrait photography with Ricoh GR Digital III
21
manual focus not available
no manual mode
no external flash support
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
40
focusing manually
exports RAW files
low resolution (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Street photography features
Ricoh GR Digital III Street photography features
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
55
exports RAW files
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Sports photography highlights
Ricoh GR Digital III Sports photography highlights
36
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers tracking autofocus
environment sealing
max frames per second low (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
17
focal length is fixed (28mm)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Travel photography info
Ricoh GR Digital III Travel photography info
61
environment sealing
flash built-in
rather wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse mode
sensor resolution low (12MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
63
has built in flash
great maximum aperture (f1.9)
low resolution (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Landscape photography info
Ricoh GR Digital III Landscape photography info
35
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
no manual mode
sensor resolution low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
no Time Lapse mode
45
focusing manually
great maximum aperture (f1.9)
pretty good screen size (3")
exports RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Vlogging factors
Ricoh GR Digital III Vlogging factors
28
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external mic jack
25
great maximum aperture (f1.9)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external mic support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus Tough-3000 and Ricoh GR Digital III
 Olympus Stylus Tough-3000Ricoh GR Digital III
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 Ricoh GR Digital III
Also called mju Tough 3000 -
Class Waterproof Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2010-01-07 2009-07-27
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III GR engine III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 3968 x 2976 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Min native ISO 64 64
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-102mm (3.6x) 28mm (1x)
Max aperture f/3.5-5.1 f/1.9
Macro focus distance 2cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.9 4.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 230 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 1 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 1.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.00 m 3.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video data format MPEG-4 -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 159 grams (0.35 lb) 208 grams (0.46 lb)
Physical dimensions 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $0 $399