Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Launched January 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Renewed by Ricoh GR Digital IV
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital III, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and the GR Digital III (10MP) is relatively comparable but the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") posses totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Tough-3000 was announced 6 months after the GR Digital III and they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the Tough-3000 grades vs the GR Digital III when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 and Ricoh GR Digital III. The whole galleries are available at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
Tough-3000 | GR Digital III |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Olympus Tough-3000
GR Digital III | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Ricoh GR Digital III
Tough-3000 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2010 | July 2009 | Same generation | |
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus Tough-3000 has got outer dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital III has measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
See the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital III in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the Tough-3000 versus the GR Digital III.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Tough-3000 and GR Digital III is 94 and 92 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizes just by seeing a spec sheet. The image underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Tough-3000 and GR Digital III.
Clearly, both of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Tough-3000 having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Olympus Tough-3000 will provide extra detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Also called | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2010-01-07 | 2009-07-27 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 159 grams (0.35 lb) | 208 grams (0.46 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $0 | $399 |