Clicky

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR II

Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
26
Overall
31
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front
 
Ricoh GR II front
Portability
89
Imaging
59
Features
55
Overall
57

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR II Key Specs

Olympus Tough-3000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
  • Launched January 2010
  • Also referred to as mju Tough 3000
Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
  • 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
  • Launched June 2015
  • Succeeded the Ricoh GR
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR II Overview

Here, we are evaluating the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR II, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and GR II (16MP) and the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and GR II (APS-C) boast totally different sensor size.

Photography Glossary

The Tough-3000 was released 6 years earlier than the GR II which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summation of how the Tough-3000 matches up against the GR II in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Ricoh GR II

 Tough-3000 GR II 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Olympus Tough-3000

 GR II Tough-3000 
LaunchedJune 2015January 2010Newer by 66 months
Manual focus More exact focusing
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1230k230kClearer display (+1000k dot)

Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Ricoh GR II

 Tough-3000 GR II 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch display Missing Touch display

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR II Physical Comparison

If you're looking to travel with your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus Tough-3000 has outer measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Ricoh GR II has measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") with a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs).

Look at the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR II in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the Tough-3000 vs the GR II.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR II size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the Tough-3000 and GR II is 94 and 89 respectively.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR II top view buttons comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR II Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is tough to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by going through technical specs. The picture below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Tough-3000 and GR II.

As you have seen, each of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Tough-3000 because of its smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF harder and the Ricoh GR II will show greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged Tough-3000 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR II sensor size comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR II Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh GR II as a Portrait photography camera
21
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
can't use external flash
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
75
you can focus manually
decent MP (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
has face detect autofocus
supports RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus Tough-3000
Street photography with Ricoh GR II
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
74
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
lighter than competition in class (251 grams)
very good high ISO (25,600)
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Sports photography info
Ricoh GR II Sports photography info
36
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides tracking autofocus
weather sealing
max frames per second low (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
50
decent MP (16MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
has tracking focus
can't change focal length (28mm)
slow frames per second (4.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
lack of phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Travel photography information
Ricoh GR II Travel photography information
61
weather sealing
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
no Timelapse function
low MP (12MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
67
lighter than competition in class (251g)
decent MP (16MP)
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse recording
does not feature selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Landscape photography factors
Ricoh GR II Landscape photography factors
35
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
no manual control
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
no Timelapse function
59
you can focus manually
pretty good screen size (3")
decent MP (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
very good high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW files
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
lack of Timelapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Vlogging advice
Ricoh GR II Vlogging advice
28
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external microphone jack
32
has face detect autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition in class (251g)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
lack of microphone port
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus Tough-3000 and Ricoh GR II
 Olympus Stylus Tough-3000Ricoh GR II
General Information
Make Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 Ricoh GR II
Also Known as mju Tough 3000 -
Class Waterproof Large Sensor Compact
Launched 2010-01-07 2015-06-17
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III GR Engine V
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 23.7 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 372.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 3968 x 2976 4928 x 3264
Highest native ISO 1600 25600
Min native ISO 64 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-102mm (3.6x) 28mm (1x)
Highest aperture f/3.5-5.1 f/2.8-16.0
Macro focus range 2cm 10cm
Crop factor 5.9 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 1,230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 300 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 1.0fps 4.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.00 m 3.00 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 159g (0.35 lbs) 251g (0.55 lbs)
Physical dimensions 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 80
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.6
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 13.7
DXO Low light score not tested 1078
Other
Battery life - 320 photos
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery model - DB-65
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 seconds) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Price at release $0 $599