Clicky

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR III

Portability
94
Imaging
34
Features
26
Overall
30
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front
 
Ricoh GR III front
Portability
90
Imaging
68
Features
62
Overall
65

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs

Olympus Tough-3000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
  • Revealed January 2010
  • Additionally Known as mju Tough 3000
Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 102400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
  • 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
  • Launched September 2018
  • Previous Model is Ricoh GR III
  • Updated by Ricoh GR III
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR III Overview

Let's examine more in depth at the Olympus Tough-3000 and Ricoh GR III, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and GR III (24MP) and the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and GR III (APS-C) feature different sensor size.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The Tough-3000 was manufactured 9 years prior to the GR III which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise summation of how the Tough-3000 grades vs the GR III for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

        

Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Ricoh GR III

 Tough-3000 GR III 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Olympus Tough-3000

 GR III Tough-3000 
LaunchedSeptember 2018January 2010Newer by 106 months
Manually focus More precise focusing
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1037k230kCrisper screen (+807k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Ricoh GR III

 Tough-3000 GR III 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison

In case you're going to travel with your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus Tough-3000 features outside dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Ricoh GR III has dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus Tough-3000 and Ricoh GR III in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the Tough-3000 compared to the GR III.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR III size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Tough-3000 and GR III is 94 and 90 respectively.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR III top view buttons comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison

Often, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by looking through specifications. The picture here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Tough-3000 and GR III.

To sum up, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Tough-3000 due to its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF tougher and the Ricoh GR III will result in more detail due to its extra 12MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged Tough-3000 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR III sensor size comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Portrait photography factors
Ricoh GR III Portrait photography factors
20
no manual focus
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
80
you can focus manually
MP count decent (24 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
features face detection autofocus
supports RAW formats
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh GR III as a Street photography camera
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
84
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
includes focus via touch
lighter than competition (257 grams)
great high ISO (102,400)
screen does not articulate
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Sports photography highlights
Ricoh GR III Sports photography highlights
35
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides tracking autofocus
environment sealing
max frames per second low (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
megapixel count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
75
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (24 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
features tracking autofocus
has phase detect autofocus
fixed focal length (28mm)
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Travel photography highlights
Ricoh GR III Travel photography highlights
61
environment sealing
has built in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
69
lighter than competition (257 grams)
includes focus via touch
MP count decent (24 megapixels)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Landscape photography features
Ricoh GR III Landscape photography features
35
relatively wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
no manual focus
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
no manual exposure
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
lack of Time Lapse mode
69
you can focus manually
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (24MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
does not have anti aliasing filter
great high ISO (102,400)
supports RAW formats
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus Tough-3000
Vlogging with Ricoh GR III
28
relatively wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
does not feature selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external mic jack
37
touch screen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition (257g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
doesn't have external mic support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus Tough-3000 and Ricoh GR III
 Olympus Stylus Tough-3000Ricoh GR III
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 Ricoh GR III
Also Known as mju Tough 3000 -
Category Waterproof Large Sensor Compact
Revealed 2010-01-07 2018-09-25
Physical type Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 24 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 3968 x 2976 6000 x 4000
Maximum native ISO 1600 102400
Min native ISO 64 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-102mm (3.6x) 28mm (1x)
Highest aperture f/3.5-5.1 f/2.8-16
Macro focusing distance 2cm 6cm
Focal length multiplier 5.9 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7" 3"
Screen resolution 230k dots 1,037k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter rate 1.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.00 m no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) Yes
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 159g (0.35 lb) 257g (0.57 lb)
Dimensions 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 seconds) Yes
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported)
Card slots Single Single
Price at release $0 $900