Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR III
94 Imaging
34 Features
26 Overall
30
90 Imaging
68 Features
62 Overall
65
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Launched September 2018
- Previous Model is Ricoh GR III
- Updated by Ricoh GR III
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR III Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Olympus Tough-3000 and Ricoh GR III, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and GR III (24MP) and the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and GR III (APS-C) feature different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Tough-3000 was manufactured 9 years prior to the GR III which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise summation of how the Tough-3000 grades vs the GR III for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR III Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Ricoh GR III. The entire galleries are available at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Ricoh GR III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Ricoh GR III
| Tough-3000 | GR III |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Olympus Tough-3000
| GR III | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2018 | January 2010 | Newer by 106 months | |
| Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Ricoh GR III
| Tough-3000 | GR III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus Tough-3000 features outside dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Ricoh GR III has dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus Tough-3000 and Ricoh GR III in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the Tough-3000 compared to the GR III.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Tough-3000 and GR III is 94 and 90 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by looking through specifications. The picture here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Tough-3000 and GR III.
To sum up, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Tough-3000 due to its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF tougher and the Ricoh GR III will result in more detail due to its extra 12MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged Tough-3000 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR III Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Ricoh GR III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Ricoh GR III |
| Also Known as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
| Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-01-07 | 2018-09-25 |
| Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 102400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8-16 |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 6cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 1,037k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 159g (0.35 lb) | 257g (0.57 lb) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $0 | $900 |