Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Released January 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Revealed November 2009
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Olympus Tough-3000 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is pretty well matched but the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) use different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Tough-3000 was unveiled 2 months later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and they are both of a similar age. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a brief overview of how the Tough-3000 matches up versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The full galleries are available at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Tough-3000 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus Tough-3000
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Tough-3000 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2010 | November 2009 | Similar age | |
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus Tough-3000 comes with outside measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus Tough-3000 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the Tough-3000 and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the Tough-3000 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 94 and 77 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to visualize the difference between sensor measurements simply by reading through specifications. The graphic here might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Tough-3000 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Plainly, both of the cameras posses the exact same resolution albeit different sensor measurements. The Tough-3000 offers the tinier sensor which is going to make getting bokeh harder.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Also called as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2010-01-07 | 2009-11-10 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 50mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.5 |
Macro focus range | 2cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 180 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 159 grams (0.35 pounds) | 453 grams (1.00 pounds) |
Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $0 | $566 |