Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Announced January 2010
- Also referred to as mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Launched February 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus Tough-3000 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) boast different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Tough-3000 was released 3 years earlier than the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a brief summary of how the Tough-3000 scores versus the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
| Tough-3000 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Olympus Tough-3000
| GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2012 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 25 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
| Tough-3000 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus Tough-3000 has outer measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has sizing of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Compare the Olympus Tough-3000 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the Tough-3000 vs the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the Tough-3000 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 94 and 69 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizes purely by researching specifications. The image here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Tough-3000 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
Plainly, both the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Tough-3000 because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will render more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged Tough-3000 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
| Otherwise known as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
| Class | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2010-01-07 | 2012-02-02 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 370.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 200 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-85mm (3.5x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 180 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 159 gr (0.35 lb) | 550 gr (1.21 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 400 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | DB-90 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $0 | $871 |