Clicky

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

Portability
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front
 
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
Portability
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs

Olympus Tough-3000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
  • Announced January 2010
  • Alternative Name is mju Tough 3000
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Introduced March 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview

Below, we will be looking at the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) is relatively similar but the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") feature totally different sensor sizing.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The Tough-3000 was unveiled 2 months earlier than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC so they are of a similar age. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the Tough-3000 scores vs the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 Tough-3000 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Olympus Tough-3000

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Tough-3000 
Manually focus  Very accurate focus
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kClearer screen (+690k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 Tough-3000 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
IntroducedJanuary 2010March 2010Similar age
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen  Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen  Absent Touch friendly screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison

		

		

			
If you are going to carry around your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus Tough-3000 provides physical dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has specifications of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at that time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the Tough-3000 vs the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC size comparison
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the Tough-3000 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 94 and 85 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Oftentimes, its hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizes merely by reading specs. The pic here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Tough-3000 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
All in all, both cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Tough-3000 having a tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF harder and the Olympus Tough-3000 will offer you greater detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively.
	
			Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Olympus Tough-3000 Portrait photography details
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Portrait photography details
21
 manual focus not available
 manual exposure not possible
 cannot use external flash
 low MP (12MP)
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW files
36
 manual focus
 exports RAW files
 no liveview
 sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
 sensor  is tiny (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Street Comparison
Street photography with Olympus Tough-3000
Street photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
62
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 environment proof
 no moving screen
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW files
65
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 exports RAW files
 lighter than competitors (355 grams)
 screen does not articulate
 sensor  is tiny (1/1.7")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Sports Comparison
 Olympus Tough-3000 as a Sports photography camera
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Sports photography camera
36
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 features tracking autofocus
 environment proof
 painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
 no shutter priority mode
 low MP (12MP)
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 lacks phase detect auto focus
25
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 no liveview
 low frames per second (2.0 frames/s)
 sensor resolution low (10MP)
 sensor  is tiny (1/1.7")
 lack of phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Travel Comparison
Olympus Tough-3000 Travel photography information
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography information
61
 environment proof
 has built in flash
 reasonably wide (28mm)
 missing Timelapse function
 low MP (12 megapixels)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 slow max aperture (f3.5)
60
 lighter than competitors (355g)
 has built in flash
 relatively wide (24mm)
 sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
Photography Glossary
Landscape Comparison
Olympus Tough-3000 Landscape photography features
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography features
35
 reasonably wide (28mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 environment proof
 manual focus not available
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 slow max aperture (f3.5)
 screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
 manual exposure not possible
 low MP (12MP)
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW files
 missing Timelapse function
47
 manual focus
 relatively wide (24mm)
 screen size is good (3 inch)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 exports RAW files
 cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
 no liveview
 sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
 sensor  is tiny (1/1.7")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus Tough-3000 Vlogging factors
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Vlogging factors
28
 reasonably wide (28mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 slow max aperture (f3.5)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
 missing external microphone jack
28
 relatively wide (24mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competitors (355 grams)
 sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 low video resolution (640 x 480 pxls)
 does not have microphone support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	

		

			
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus Tough-3000 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
 Olympus Stylus Tough-3000Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Also Known as mju Tough 3000 -
Type Waterproof Advanced Mirrorless
Announced 2010-01-07 2010-03-18
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3 and  16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Full resolution 3968 x 2976 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 64 100
RAW pictures    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Touch focus    
AF continuous    
Single AF    
Tracking AF    
AF selectice    
AF center weighted    
Multi area AF    
Live view AF    
Face detect AF    
Contract detect AF    
Phase detect AF    
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-102mm (3.6x) 24-72mm (3.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.1 f/2.5-4.4
Macro focus distance 2cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.9 4.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch capability    
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 180 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 1.0 frames per sec 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual mode    
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash range 4.00 m 4.50 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe    
AE bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format MPEG-4 Motion JPEG
Microphone support    
Headphone support    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 159 gr (0.35 pounds) 355 gr (0.78 pounds)
Dimensions 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 410 photographs
Battery style - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse feature    
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $0 $349