Clicky

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh WG-4

Portability
94
Imaging
34
Features
26
Overall
30
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front
 
Ricoh WG-4 front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs

Olympus Tough-3000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
  • Announced January 2010
  • Alternative Name is mju Tough 3000
Ricoh WG-4
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Revealed February 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview

The following is a detailed review of the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Ricoh WG-4, both Waterproof cameras by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and WG-4 (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The Tough-3000 was brought out 5 years before the WG-4 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the Tough-3000 grades against the WG-4 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

        

Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Ricoh WG-4

 Tough-3000 WG-4 

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Olympus Tough-3000

 WG-4 Tough-3000 
RevealedFebruary 2014January 2010Newer by 49 months
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Ricoh WG-4

 Tough-3000 WG-4 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither has Touch friendly display

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison

If you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus Tough-3000 has outside measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).

Look at the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Ricoh WG-4 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the Tough-3000 compared to the WG-4.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh WG-4 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Tough-3000 and WG-4 is 94 and 90 respectively.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh WG-4 top view buttons comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is difficult to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions purely by going through specs. The image below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Tough-3000 and WG-4.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 to provide more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged Tough-3000 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh WG-4 sensor size comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Portrait photography factors
Ricoh WG-4 Portrait photography factors
20
manual focus not available
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
41
you can focus manually
MP count decent (16MP)
includes face detection autofocus
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus Tough-3000
Street photography with Ricoh WG-4
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Sports photography features
Ricoh WG-4 Sports photography features
35
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking focus
environment proofing
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
45
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
includes tracking autofocus
weather proofing
max fps low (2.0 frames/s)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
bad battery power (240 shots)
lacks phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 as a Travel photography camera
61
environment proofing
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse recording
low resolution sensor (12MP)
does not have selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
72
weather proofing
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
bad battery power (240 per charge)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Landscape photography advice
Ricoh WG-4 Landscape photography advice
35
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
lack of manual mode
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
no Time Lapse recording
54
you can focus manually
rather wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
weather proofing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not available
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
bad battery power (240 shots)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Vlogging information
Ricoh WG-4 Vlogging information
28
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
does not have selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
no mic port
36
rather wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
lack of external microphone support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus Tough-3000 and Ricoh WG-4
 Olympus Stylus Tough-3000Ricoh WG-4
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 Ricoh WG-4
Alternate name mju Tough 3000 -
Category Waterproof Waterproof
Announced 2010-01-07 2014-02-05
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 3968 x 2976 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Lowest native ISO 64 125
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-102mm (3.6x) 25-100mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.5-5.1 f/2.0-4.9
Macro focusing distance 2cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.9 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 4 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 1.0 frames per second 2.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.00 m 10.00 m (Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4 H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 159 gr (0.35 lb) 230 gr (0.51 lb)
Dimensions 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 240 images
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $0 $330