Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh WG-4
94 Imaging
34 Features
26 Overall
30
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Announced January 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
The following is a detailed review of the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Ricoh WG-4, both Waterproof cameras by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and WG-4 (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Tough-3000 was brought out 5 years before the WG-4 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the Tough-3000 grades against the WG-4 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 and Ricoh WG-4. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Ricoh WG-4
| Tough-3000 | WG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Olympus Tough-3000
| WG-4 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 | January 2010 | Newer by 49 months | |
| Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Ricoh WG-4
| Tough-3000 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus Tough-3000 has outside measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Look at the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Ricoh WG-4 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the Tough-3000 compared to the WG-4.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Tough-3000 and WG-4 is 94 and 90 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions purely by going through specs. The image below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Tough-3000 and WG-4.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 to provide more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged Tough-3000 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Alternate name | mju Tough 3000 | - |
| Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2010-01-07 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 159 gr (0.35 lb) | 230 gr (0.51 lb) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $0 | $330 |