Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Portability
94 Imaging
34 Features
26 Overall
30
94 Imaging
34 Features
26 Overall
30
Portability
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
Olympus Tough-3000
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Announced January 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 3000
Ricoh WG-4 GPS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
- Newer Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS, both Waterproof cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Tough-3000 was released 5 years before the WG-4 GPS and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the Tough-3000 matches up against the WG-4 GPS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| Tough-3000 | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Olympus Tough-3000
| WG-4 GPS | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 49 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| Tough-3000 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus Tough-3000 provides outside dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is a front view scale comparison of the Tough-3000 against the WG-4 GPS.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Tough-3000 and WG-4 GPS is 94 and 90 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements merely by viewing technical specs. The photograph below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the Tough-3000 and WG-4 GPS.
As you can tell, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can count on the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots way more aggressively. The older Tough-3000 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus Tough-3000 Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Portrait photography highlights
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
has manual focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
supports face detect autofocus
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Olympus Tough-3000 Street photography advice
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Street photography advice
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
more heavy than average in class (235g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Olympus Tough-3000 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Sports photography camera
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking autofocus
weather proof
max fps very slow (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
supports tracking focus
environment sealing
continuous shooting slow (2.0 frames per second)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
not so great battery life (240 CIPA)
has no phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Olympus Tough-3000 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Travel photography camera
weather proof
built-in flash
rather wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
megapixel count low (12MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
environment sealing
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
not so great battery life (240 per charge)
more heavy than average in class (235 grams)
does not feature selfie friendly display
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Olympus Tough-3000 Landscape photography factors
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Landscape photography factors
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
lack of manual focus
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
lack of manual mode
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse mode
has manual focus
decently wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
environment sealing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
not so great battery life (240 shots)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Olympus Tough-3000
Vlogging with Ricoh WG-4 GPS
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone support
decently wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not feature selfie friendly display
doesn't have microphone port
more heavy than average in class (235g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Alternate name | mju Tough 3000 | - |
| Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2010-01-07 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 159 gr (0.35 pounds) | 235 gr (0.52 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $0 | $210 |