Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh WG-6
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Also referred to as mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Released February 2018
- Old Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Overview
Following is a thorough overview of the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Ricoh WG-6, both Waterproof cameras by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and WG-6 (20MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Tough-3000 was launched 9 years before the WG-6 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a concise view of how the Tough-3000 scores against the WG-6 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Ricoh WG-6. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Ricoh WG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Ricoh WG-6
| Tough-3000 | WG-6 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the Olympus Tough-3000
| WG-6 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2018 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 98 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Ricoh WG-6
| Tough-3000 | WG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus Tough-3000 enjoys physical dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-6 has specifications of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Ricoh WG-6 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the Tough-3000 versus the WG-6.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Tough-3000 and WG-6 is 94 and 89 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizes purely by going through technical specs. The image here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the Tough-3000 and WG-6.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-6 to provide more detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged Tough-3000 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Ricoh WG-6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Ricoh WG-6 |
| Also Known as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
| Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-01-07 | 2018-02-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Flash on, flash off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 159 gr (0.35 lbs) | 246 gr (0.54 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 shots |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $0 | $271 |
