Clicky

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung GX-1S

Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
26
Overall
31
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front
 
Samsung GX-1S front
Portability
68
Imaging
44
Features
36
Overall
40

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs

Olympus Tough-3000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
  • Introduced January 2010
  • Additionally referred to as mju Tough 3000
Samsung GX-1S
(Full Review)
  • 6MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • No Video
  • Pentax KAF Mount
  • 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
  • Revealed January 2006
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 vs Samsung GX-1S: A Hands-On Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts

Choosing a camera that fits your photographic style and practical needs can be a tricky balancing act - especially when faced with two very different models like the Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 and Samsung GX-1S. On the surface, these cameras couldn’t be more distinct. One is a rugged, waterproof compact designed for adventurers and casual shooters, while the other is a mid-sized DSLR aimed squarely at advanced amateurs and professionals.

Having field-tested both extensively across multiple photography disciplines, I’m here to guide you through their real-world capabilities, technical nuances, and usability. My goal is to provide a balanced, expert perspective that helps you make an informed choice - whether you’re hunting wildlife in harsh conditions or crafting studio portraits.

First Impressions: Design Philosophy and Ergonomics

Let’s start by putting these two physical contenders side by side to understand what kind of user experience they offer.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung GX-1S size comparison

The Olympus Tough-3000 is incredibly compact and lightweight, weighing just 159 grams with dimensions of 96 x 65 x 23 mm. It slips easily into a jacket pocket or backpack side pouch and is made to go anywhere: rain, snow, or a sudden drop. Its rugged body boasts environmental sealing - waterproof, shockproof, and freezeproof - checkmarks for anyone shooting in challenging outdoor or adventure settings.

By contrast, the Samsung GX-1S, at 605 grams and a sizeable 125 x 93 x 66 mm frame, clearly asserts itself as a DSLR shooter’s tool. Bulkier but well-engineered with a traditional pentaprism optical viewfinder and robust grip, it prioritizes manual handling and lens interchangeability over compactness.

The weight and ergonomics differences dictate much about their intended use. The Olympus invites spontaneous shooting, travel-friendly portability, and durability, whereas the Samsung demands commitment but returns it with greater creative control.

A Closer Look at Their Essential Controls and Interface

Handling is more than just size and weight; control layout and ease of use directly impact your shooting efficiency.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung GX-1S top view buttons comparison

On top, the Olympus is stripped down. No dedicated dials for exposure modes or shutter priority - just simple toggles and a mode dial. The interface is minimalistic, reflecting its target user: those who want reliable point-and-shoot toughness without fussing over settings.

The Samsung GX-1S sports a classic DSLR control cluster: shutter speed dial, exposure compensation button, and a command dial - all crucial for quick adjustments. It supports aperture priority, shutter priority, and fully manual exposures, options that advanced shooters need.

While the Tough-3000 emphasizes simplicity and durability, the GX-1S rewards photographers who want granular control over their exposures and creative choices.

Sensors and Image Quality: Size Really Matters

Image quality hinges heavily on sensor technology and size, one area where these two diverge fundamentally.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung GX-1S sensor size comparison

The Olympus Tough-3000 uses a 1/2.3" CCD sensor measuring 6.08 x 4.56 mm with a resolution of 12 megapixels. While this is typical for compact rugged cameras, it’s limited when it comes to dynamic range and low-light performance. The sensor area of roughly 27.7 mm² restricts the amount of light each pixel can gather, introducing noise at higher ISOs and limiting fine detail in shadows and highlights.

On the flip side, the Samsung GX-1S packs a much larger APS-C sized CCD sensor (23.5 x 15.7 mm), wider at 368.95 mm², albeit with just 6 megapixels. This older generation sensor’s advantage is in bigger pixels that collect more light, delivering cleaner images and superior tonal gradation - even if resolution remains modest by today’s standards. The APS-C format also lends itself to more creative depth of field control.

If image fidelity, especially in portraits or landscapes, is paramount, the Samsung’s sensor delivers a noticeable edge, despite its age and lower resolution. However, the Olympus can produce acceptable sharpness and color fidelity for casual use and quick snaps.

LCD Screens and Viewfinders: Feedback During Shooting

Immediate visual feedback is essential for any photographer, so let’s see what each camera offers on the viewing front.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The Tough-3000’s fixed 2.7” screen has 230k dots - bright enough outdoors but with limited angles and no touchscreen capabilities. Given its design, it lacks an optical or electronic viewfinder altogether, so composing in bright sunlight can sometimes be tricky.

In contrast, the Samsung GX-1S comes with a slightly smaller 2.5" screen at 210k dots, but more importantly, it features a pentaprism optical viewfinder with 95% coverage and 0.64x magnification. This is a gold standard in DSLR shooting, offering eye-level composition, consistent framing, and no lag. However, the GX-1S’s screen doesn’t support live view, a feature that has become standard on modern DSLRs but was absent in 2006 models like this one.

For straightforward framing on the run in bright settings, the GX-1S trumps the Tough-3000. Yet, for underwater or extreme environments where an optical viewfinder might fog or be unusable, the Tough-3000’s display paired with ruggedness still holds merit.

Evaluating Autofocus: Speed, Accuracy, and Usability

Autofocus (AF) technology defines your success with fast-moving subjects and critical focus accuracy.

The Tough-3000 utilizes contrast-detection AF, which is inherently slower and less accurate - especially on moving targets. It provides single AF and can track focused areas to a degree, though the system’s simplicity manifests in slower acquisition and hunting in low light.

The Samsung GX-1S impresses with an 11-point phase-detection AF system, tailor-made for quick, precise focus during action, sports, or wildlife photography. It supports both single and continuous AF modes, enhancing success rates markedly during burst shooting.

While the Tough-3000’s AF is serviceable for general snapshots and static scenes, serious photographers who require rapid acquisition and tracking will quickly find it limiting. The GX-1S’s autofocus system outperforms in every dynamic shooting scenario, though it lacks face or eye-detection technology found on modern cameras.

How About Burst Modes and Continuous Shooting?

Burst rate is essential for sports, wildlife, and any fast-action photography. Here we see a large disparity.

The Olympus Tough-3000 shoots at a paltry 1 fps (frame per second), which effectively restricts it to single-shot or very slow sequences. This is expected for a rugged compact but places it far behind DSLRs or advanced mirrorless models.

The Samsung GX-1S, with 3 fps continuous shooting, offers more breathing room to capture decisive moments - double the speed of the Tough-3000 makes a significant difference in sports or wildlife.

In real-world shooting, 3 fps is adequate for casual sports but won’t match current high-end cameras that push 10+ fps. Still, it’s a big step up from the Tough-3000’s snail pace for burst needs.

Day-to-Day Use for Different Photography Disciplines

Portraiture: Rendering Skin Tones and Bokeh

The Samsung’s APS-C sensor, even at 6 megapixels, delivers smoother tonal transitions on skin and better low light handling. Coupled with interchangeable Pentax KAF lenses - many with wide apertures - you can achieve shallow depth of field and creamy bokeh effects.

The Olympus Tough-3000’s fixed 28-102 mm equivalent lens has maximum apertures of f/3.5-5.1, limiting bokeh capability. Skin tones appear okay in good light but lack subtle nuance and dynamic range. It’s better suited to environmental or documentary portraits rather than studio mimicry.

Landscape Photography: Dynamic Range and Detail Capture

Landscape shooting benefits from wide dynamic range and high resolution. The Samsung’s larger sensor area captures more tonal information, robust shadow detail, and better highlight control. The 3:2 aspect ratio further suits traditional landscape composition.

The Olympus sensor’s limitations restrict dynamic range. Additionally, the fixed lens maxes out at 28mm equivalent wide, which restricts ultra-wide vistas. However, its weather sealing grants freedom to shoot in rain or snow - conditions that would risk damage on the GX-1S.

Wildlife and Sports: Autofocus and Burst Performance

When tracking fast-moving animals or athletes, autofocus speed and burst capacity rule. Samsung’s GX-1S shines here, with phase detection AF and 3 fps bursts allowing better subject tracking and multiple frame captures.

Tough-3000, with its slow 1 fps and contrast-detection AF, is at a disadvantage - a real hindrance for action shots or unpredictable wildlife behavior.

Street and Travel Photography: Discreteness and Portability

Portability and stealth are key in street and travel contexts. The Tough-3000 excels here due to its pocket-sized form, ruggedness, and simplistic operation - it’s a true grab-and-go camera.

The GX-1S is considerably bulkier and draws more attention, typical of early DSLRs, though the optical viewfinder aids framing in fast-moving street scenes and doesn’t strain battery life.

Battery life specifics aren’t documented here, but generally, DSLRs like the GX-1S with AA batteries tend to last longer in controlled shooting, while compact cameras rely on proprietary batteries that vary widely.

Macro Photography and Close-Up Potential

The Olympus allows focusing as close as 2 cm, a boon for macro and detail shots, aided by its built-in image stabilization.

The Samsung depends on lens choice for macro work - if you invest in suitable Pentax macro lenses, focus stacking and extension tubes, the DSLR will surpass the Tough-3000’s fixed lens close-up performance hands down.

Video Capabilities: A Brief Look

Neither camera is a video powerhouse - expected given their launches in 2006 and 2010.

The Olympus Tough-3000 can capture HD video at 1280x720, a respectable feature for the time, while the Samsung GX-1S lacks video functionality altogether.

If video capture is a priority, Tough-3000 holds a minimal advantage with basic MPEG-4 recording, albeit with limited controls and no external mic support.

Connectivity and Storage

Both cameras offer single card slots - Olympus uses SD/SDHC, Samsung uses SD/MMC. Simple and standard choices.

Neither offers wireless connectivity, Bluetooth, or GPS, reflecting their mid-2000s to early 2010s vintage. Connectivity options are minimal, so image transfer depends on wired USB (USB 2.0 on Olympus, USB 1.0 on Samsung) or card readers.

In modern workflows, this lack can add friction, but for photographers prioritizing image quality and shooting experience, it’s a manageable limitation.

Reliability and Build Quality

The Olympus Tough-3000’s rugged build (waterproof, shockproof, freezeproof) is its defining feature. It’s built to be abused and survive. This makes it an attractive secondary camera for adventure travel, extreme sports, or underwater use.

The Samsung GX-1S lacks environmental sealing and should be protected from harsh conditions. However, it is solidly constructed and designed for extended manual use in comfortable conditions.

Assessing Value: Pricing and Overall Performance

Pricing is a stark contrast: The Tough-3000 originally retails near entry-level prices, while the GX-1S was a higher-end option at launch.

Looking at overall performance, the GX-1S edges ahead in image quality, autofocus, and creative versatility, while the Tough-3000 scores for durability and portability.

Evaluating by genre:

  • Tough-3000: Best for travel, rugged outdoor, casual snapshots.
  • GX-1S: Better suited for portraits, landscapes, wildlife, and sports requiring manual control.

Sample Images: Visualizing the Differences

Viewing sample photographs side-by-side reveals the Samsung’s superior dynamic range and detail, especially in complex lighting and shadow areas. The Olympus renders colors vibrantly but shows more noise in darker scenes.

Final Thoughts: Which Camera Fits Your Needs?

The Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 and Samsung GX-1S embody two distinct photographic philosophies.

Choose the Olympus Tough-3000 if:

  • You need a compact, tough camera for adventure, travel, or harsh environments.
  • You prioritize portability and ease over fine control or image quality.
  • Your photography is casual or documentary and you accept limited creative adjustments.
  • Video capability, even basic, is a bonus.

Opt for the Samsung GX-1S if:

  • You want stronger image quality through a larger sensor and better lenses.
  • Manual control, versatile exposure modes, and faster autofocus matter.
  • You shoot portraits, landscapes or sports where precision matters.
  • You don’t mind the bulk and care for optical viewfinder framing.

In summary, while the Tough-3000 offers rugged reliability and fun in tough settings, the Samsung GX-1S delivers the creative and technical tools advanced photographers need. Both have their places in a photographer's gear arsenal, but your individual needs and shooting style will tip the scales. Having shot thousands of cameras over the years, I can say: knowing your priorities first is the surest way to make the right pick.

I hope this detailed comparison has shed light on these two disparate yet intriguing cameras. If you’re looking for further individual reviews or lens suggestions to pair with the GX-1S, or accessories to maximize the Tough-3000’s ruggedness, feel free to dive deeper. Either way, both bring unique value for enthusiasts ready to explore photography on their terms.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus Tough-3000 and Samsung GX-1S
 Olympus Stylus Tough-3000Samsung GX-1S
General Information
Company Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 Samsung GX-1S
Also called as mju Tough 3000 -
Type Waterproof Advanced DSLR
Introduced 2010-01-07 2006-01-16
Physical type Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 6 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 3:2
Maximum resolution 3968 x 2976 3008 x 2008
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 64 200
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points - 11
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Pentax KAF
Lens focal range 28-102mm (3.6x) -
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.1 -
Macro focus range 2cm -
Total lenses - 151
Crop factor 5.9 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7" 2.5"
Resolution of screen 230k dots 210k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.64x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 1.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.00 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize - 1/180 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 None
Video data format MPEG-4 -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 159 gr (0.35 lb) 605 gr (1.33 lb)
Dimensions 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 seconds) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal SD/MMC card
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $0 $850