Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung GX-20
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31


58 Imaging
53 Features
52 Overall
52
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung GX-20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Released January 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 800g - 142 x 101 x 72mm
- Revealed January 2008
- Succeeded the Samsung GX-10

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung GX-20 Overview
Here is a in-depth comparison of the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Samsung GX-20, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and the GX-20 (15MP) is pretty similar but the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and GX-20 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor sizing.

The Tough-3000 was launched 24 months later than the GX-20 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-20 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going into a full comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the Tough-3000 scores vs the GX-20 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung GX-20 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 and Samsung GX-20. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery and Samsung GX-20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Samsung GX-20
Tough-3000 | GX-20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2010 | ![]() | January 2008 | Fresher by 24 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-20 over the Olympus Tough-3000
GX-20 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Samsung GX-20
Tough-3000 | GX-20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equal screen measurement |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung GX-20 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus Tough-3000 offers physical dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung GX-20 has sizing of 142mm x 101mm x 72mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") and a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).
Examine the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Samsung GX-20 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the Tough-3000 vs the GX-20.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Tough-3000 and GX-20 is 94 and 58 respectively.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung GX-20 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to see the gap between sensor sizing purely by reviewing technical specs. The graphic here should give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Tough-3000 and GX-20.
As you can tell, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Tough-3000 due to its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Samsung GX-20 will offer more detail utilizing its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The fresher Tough-3000 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung GX-20 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung GX-20 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Samsung GX-20 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Samsung GX-20 |
Also called as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2010-01-07 | 2008-01-24 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4688 x 3120 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 159 grams (0.35 lbs) | 800 grams (1.76 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 142 x 101 x 72mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 68 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 714 |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $0 | $850 |