Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung HZ15W
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
90 Imaging
34 Features
31 Overall
32
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung HZ15W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Released February 2009
- Additionally Known as WB550
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung HZ15W Overview
In this write-up, we will be evaluating the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Samsung HZ15W, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and the HZ15W (12MP) is pretty similar and they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Tough-3000 was released 11 months later than the HZ15W and they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick view of how the Tough-3000 matches up versus the HZ15W in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung HZ15W Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Samsung HZ15W. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Samsung HZ15W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Samsung HZ15W
| Tough-3000 | HZ15W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2010 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 11 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ15W over the Olympus Tough-3000
| HZ15W | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Samsung HZ15W
| Tough-3000 | HZ15W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung HZ15W Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus Tough-3000 comes with external measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung HZ15W has dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Samsung HZ15W in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the Tough-3000 compared to the HZ15W.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Tough-3000 and HZ15W is 94 and 90 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung HZ15W Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements just by going over specs. The graphic underneath might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Tough-3000 and HZ15W.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same MP and you can expect similar quality of images though you really should take the launch date of the products into consideration. The younger Tough-3000 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung HZ15W Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Samsung HZ15W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Samsung HZ15W |
| Also called as | mju Tough 3000 | WB550 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-01-07 | 2009-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 159 gr (0.35 lb) | 249 gr (0.55 lb) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $0 | $330 |